Juncheng Shang vs Martin Cuevas — Puerto Vallarta CH Round of 32

Puerto Vallarta CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
CHN
Juncheng Shang
#274ATP
1746ELO
1698Hard ELO
21 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 22 November 2021
hard
URU
Martin Cuevas
34 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWLLLW
Shang J.
6-4 6-4
Cuevas M.
Shang J.
662
Cuevas M.
440

Juncheng Shang defeated Martin Cuevas 6-4 6-4 in the Puerto Vallarta CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Juncheng Shang edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Shang J.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Cuevas M.

Cuevas M.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Shang J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Shang J.Cuevas M.
34
Serve
—
18
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Shang J.Cuevas M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
55%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
70%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
53%
46%
Service points won·Even
63%
59%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Even
62%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.6
4.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.7
4.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 46). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Shang J.Cuevas M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
76
14
Break points saved·Dominant
96
35
Break points won·Clear edge
45
22
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
20
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
86
71

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Shang J.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 245 days (−1.5)
Cuevas M.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.2
Prev. match
9.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Altmaier D.[2]
Tabilo A.[3]
6-33-66-3
Semi-finals
Altmaier D.[2]
Mmoh M.[5]
6-46-2
Tabilo A.[3]
Watanuki Y.
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Mmoh M.[5]
Uchida K.
7-676-3
Altmaier D.[2]
Svajda Z.
4-67-686-3
Tabilo A.[3]
Ito T.[8]
6-26-2
Watanuki Y.
Cuevas P.[1]
4-66-42-0
R16
Cuevas P.[1]
Franco Descotte M.
7-630-0
Altmaier D.[2]
Nanda G.
6-36-3
Svajda Z.
Harrison C.[6]
6-17-69
Ito T.[8]
Hernandez Serrano J.
6-26-3
Watanuki Y.
Wu T.[7]
6-757-56-3
Tabilo A.[3]
Young D.
6-26-1
Uchida K.
Galarneau A.
6-46-2
Mmoh M.[5]
Shang J.
7-54-66-4
R32
Nanda G.
Aragone J.
6-26-0
Wu T.[7]
Draxl L.
6-36-1
Altmaier D.[2]
Redlicki M.
7-656-1
Uchida K.
Sarkissian A.
6-36-4
Shang J.
Cuevas M.
6-46-4
Ito T.[8]
Brouwer G.
6-27-63
Watanuki Y.
Statham J.
6-36-2
Tabilo A.[3]
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-36-2
Franco Descotte M.
Lopez Villasenor G.
6-727-56-0
Harrison C.[6]
Ortega Olmedo R.
6-46-0
Svajda Z.
Langmo C.
5-76-47-5
Galarneau A.
Escobedo E.[4]
7-56-747-5
Young D.
Cossu M.
6-16-3
Mmoh M.[5]
Chappell N.
6-26-3
Cuevas P.[1]
Kovacevic A.
7-56-4
Hernandez Serrano J.
Rybakov A.
5-74-4