Aleksandar Vukic vs Tung Lin Wu — Champaign CH Round of 32

Champaign CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Aleksandar Vukic
AUS4
Aleksandar Vukic
#104ATP
1630ELO
1597Hard ELO
$366kYTD
$3.9MCAREER
30 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 November 2021
hard
Tung Lin Wu
TPE
Tung Lin Wu
#345ATP
1406ELO
1376Hard ELO
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLLWL
Vukic A.
6-3 6-3
Wu T.
Vukic A.
662
Wu T.
330

Aleksandar Vukic defeated Tung Lin Wu 6-3 6-3 in the Champaign CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Aleksandar Vukic came in ranked #104.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Vukic A.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Wu T.

Wu T.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Vukic A.

Serve advantage — Wu T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Vukic A.Wu T.
21
Serve
—
7
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Vukic A.Wu T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
68%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Slight edge
34%
39%
Break points saved·Even
62%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.4
3.8
Double faults / match·Even
1.9
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Vukic A.Wu T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
58
10
Break points saved·Clear edge
97
84
Break points won·Slight edge
16
6
Deciding sets·Dominant
72
6
Tiebreaks·Dominant
80
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Vukic A.
7.3
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Wu T.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.2+221 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.8Hard Elo 1376
7.1Overall Elo 1630
ELO gap
2.9Overall Elo 1406
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
6.5
Surface form
5.7
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
4.2
Minutes 14d
7.8
4.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Vukic A.Wu T.
Freshness·Slight edge
85
80

Vukic A.: 2 days rest · 1 match, 22 games (7d) · Wu T.: 5 days rest · 1 match, 23 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Kozlov S.[8]
Vukic A.[4]
5-76-36-4
Semi-finals
Kozlov S.[8]
Wolf J.[3]
6-26-3
Vukic A.[4]
Watanuki Y.
7-686-4
Quarter-finals
Kozlov S.[8]
Krueger M.[2]
6-46-4
Vukic A.[4]
Soeda G.
6-26-2
Watanuki Y.
Shelton B.
6-26-1
Wolf J.[3]
Kirkov V.
6-36-2
R16
Soeda G.
Jung J.[5]
6-45-76-4
Watanuki Y.
Altmaier D.[1]
6-26-1
Shelton B.
Krstin P.
4-66-06-1
Kozlov S.[8]
Smith K.
6-36-1
Krueger M.[2]
Harrison C.
6-31-66-4
Vukic A.[4]
Brouwer G.
6-46-4
Kirkov V.
Chappell N.
6-26-3
Wolf J.[3]
Uchida K.
6-36-4
R32
Krueger M.[2]
Mejia N.
6-36-3
Wolf J.[3]
Ito T.
6-33-66-3
Kirkov V.
Gunneswaran P.[6]
7-56-1
Soeda G.
Kwiatkowski T.
6-16-4
Brouwer G.
Kovacevic A.
7-53-67-65
Vukic A.[4]
Wu T.
6-36-3
Shelton B.
Rola B.[7]
3-66-46-4
Altmaier D.[1]
Jaziri M.
6-36-4
Krstin P.
Kadhe A.
7-57-5
Watanuki Y.
Galarneau A.
6-44-66-0
Chappell N.
Nava E.
6-37-65
Jung J.[5]
Torpegaard M.
6-23-66-4
Harrison C.
Clark E.
4-66-36-3
Kozlov S.[8]
Aragone J.
3-66-36-4
Smith K.
Mmoh M.
5-3
Uchida K.
Uchiyama Y.
6-43-1