Jiri Lehecka vs Harold Mayot — Pau CH Quarter-final

Pau CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Jiri Lehecka
CZE
Jiri Lehecka
#12ATP
1922ELO
1882Hard ELO
$1.5MYTD
$8.9MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 November 2021
hard
Harold Mayot
FRA
Harold Mayot
#200ATP
1571ELO
1548Hard ELO
$72kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWWLWW
Lehecka J.
6-4 6-2
Mayot H.
Lehecka J.
662
Mayot H.
420

Jiri Lehecka defeated Harold Mayot 6-4 6-2 in the Pau CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Jiri Lehecka came in ranked #12.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Lehecka J.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Mayot H.

Mayot H.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Lehecka J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Lehecka J.Mayot H.
56
Serve
—
35
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Lehecka J.Mayot H.
1st serve in·Even
63%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
66%
63%
Return points won·Even
35%
38%
Break points saved·Even
65%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.1
5.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.2
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Lehecka J.Mayot H.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
86
29
Break points saved·Slight edge
99
92
Break points won·Dominant
62
22
Deciding sets·Dominant
98
32
Tiebreaks·Dominant
96
8

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Lehecka J.
7.5
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Mayot H.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
9.0+334 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.0Hard Elo 1548
9.3Overall Elo 1922
ELO gap
0.7Overall Elo 1571
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.2
Surface form
3.5
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
5.5
Minutes 14d
8.9
7.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
7.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Lehecka J.Mayot H.
Freshness·Clear edge
77
100

Lehecka J.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 44 games (7d) · Mayot H.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Albot R.[7]
Lehecka J.
6-27-65
Semi-finals
Lehecka J.
Rune H.[2]
3-66-36-4
Albot R.[7]
Stakhovsky S.
6-26-736-1
Quarter-finals
Lehecka J.
Mayot H.
6-46-2
Albot R.[7]
Lopez F.[1]
6-37-65
Rune H.[2]
Cressy M.[6]
6-26-2
Stakhovsky S.
Gombos N.[5]
6-41-67-65
R16
Cressy M.[6]
Sachko V.
0-66-16-1
Gombos N.[5]
Kotov P.
6-36-4
Mayot H.
Geerts M.
6-04-67-65
Stakhovsky S.
Added D.
6-44-66-4
Albot R.[7]
Kravchenko G.
7-626-4
Lopez F.[1]
Ajdukovic D.
6-34-66-4
Rune H.[2]
Fanselow S.
6-26-2
Lehecka J.
Hemery C.
7-644-67-5
R32
Stakhovsky S.
Novak D.[4]
6-36-1
Kravchenko G.
Giannessi A.
7-54-66-2
Albot R.[7]
Lestienne C.
6-24-66-2
Hemery C.
Janvier M.
6-36-756-3
Cressy M.[6]
Blancaneaux G.
6-34-67-65
Added D.
Diez S.
1-67-626-2
Lopez F.[1]
Fabbiano T.
6-26-1
Ajdukovic D.
Tseng C.
0-67-656-2
Mayot H.
Kolar Z.[8]
6-46-4
Fanselow S.
Moriya H.
7-656-4
Rune H.[2]
Cagnina J.
6-07-5
Sachko V.
Ritschard A.
6-716-16-2
Lehecka J.
Simon G.[3]
6-16-726-2
Geerts M.
Marcora R.
6-46-2
Gombos N.[5]
Debru G.
6-46-1
Kotov P.
Arnaboldi A.
6-26-4