Go Soeda vs Thai Son Kwiatkowski — Champaign CH Round of 32

Champaign CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
JPN
Go Soeda
41 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 November 2021
hard
USA
Thai Son Kwiatkowski
#1589ATP
31 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLLL
Soeda G.
6-1 6-4
Kwiatkowski T.
Soeda G.
662
Kwiatkowski T.
140

Go Soeda defeated Thai Son Kwiatkowski 6-1 6-4 in the Champaign CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Soeda G.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Kwiatkowski T.

Kwiatkowski T.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Soeda G.

Serve advantage — Kwiatkowski T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Soeda G.Kwiatkowski T.
1st serve in·Even
60%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
65%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
60%
62%
Return points won·Even
35%
37%
Break points saved·Even
55%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.5
6.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.5
3.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (45 vs 126). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Soeda G.Kwiatkowski T.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
23
5
Break points saved·Even
61
65
Break points won·Slight edge
14
6
Deciding sets·Dominant
46
1
Tiebreaks·Even
26
26

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Soeda G.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Kwiatkowski T.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.2
Surface form
4.9
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.2
Minutes 14d
6.0
4.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Kozlov S.[8]
Vukic A.[4]
5-76-36-4
Semi-finals
Kozlov S.[8]
Wolf J.[3]
6-26-3
Vukic A.[4]
Watanuki Y.
7-686-4
Quarter-finals
Kozlov S.[8]
Krueger M.[2]
6-46-4
Vukic A.[4]
Soeda G.
6-26-2
Watanuki Y.
Shelton B.
6-26-1
Wolf J.[3]
Kirkov V.
6-36-2
R16
Soeda G.
Jung J.[5]
6-45-76-4
Watanuki Y.
Altmaier D.[1]
6-26-1
Shelton B.
Krstin P.
4-66-06-1
Kozlov S.[8]
Smith K.
6-36-1
Krueger M.[2]
Harrison C.
6-31-66-4
Vukic A.[4]
Brouwer G.
6-46-4
Kirkov V.
Chappell N.
6-26-3
Wolf J.[3]
Uchida K.
6-36-4
R32
Krueger M.[2]
Mejia N.
6-36-3
Wolf J.[3]
Ito T.
6-33-66-3
Kirkov V.
Gunneswaran P.[6]
7-56-1
Soeda G.
Kwiatkowski T.
6-16-4
Brouwer G.
Kovacevic A.
7-53-67-65
Vukic A.[4]
Wu T.
6-36-3
Shelton B.
Rola B.[7]
3-66-46-4
Altmaier D.[1]
Jaziri M.
6-36-4
Krstin P.
Kadhe A.
7-57-5
Watanuki Y.
Galarneau A.
6-44-66-0
Chappell N.
Nava E.
6-37-65
Jung J.[5]
Torpegaard M.
6-23-66-4
Harrison C.
Clark E.
4-66-36-3
Kozlov S.[8]
Aragone J.
3-66-36-4
Smith K.
Mmoh M.
5-3
Uchida K.
Uchiyama Y.
6-43-1