Maximilian Marterer vs Emilio Gomez — Helsinki CH Round of 32

Helsinki CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GER
Maximilian Marterer
31 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 15 November 2021
hard
ECU
Emilio Gomez
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLLW
Marterer M.
4-6 6-2 6-3
Gomez E.
Marterer M.
4662
Gomez E.
6231

Maximilian Marterer defeated Emilio Gomez 4-6 6-2 6-3 in the Helsinki CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Marterer M.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Gomez E.

Gomez E.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Marterer M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Marterer M.Gomez E.
1st serve in·Even
61%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
49%
Service points won·Even
65%
61%
Return points won·Even
35%
39%
Break points saved·Even
61%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.8
3.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.3
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 195). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Marterer M.Gomez E.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
47
32
Break points saved·Clear edge
93
77
Break points won·Slight edge
13
19
Deciding sets·Dominant
69
23
Tiebreaks·Dominant
40
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Marterer M.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Gomez E.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.5
Surface form
4.8
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
5.8
Minutes 14d
8.2
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Molcan A.[3]
Sousa J.
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Molcan A.[3]
Shevchenko A.
6-27-64
Sousa J.
Laaksonen H.[2]
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Shevchenko A.
Moraing M.
6-40-0
Laaksonen H.[2]
Milojevic N.[8]
6-26-3
Molcan A.[3]
Otte O.[5]
6-34-66-1
Sousa J.
Broady L.[6]
6-736-27-61
R16
Laaksonen H.[2]
Lenz J.
6-27-5
Broady L.[6]
De Loore J.
6-37-5
Otte O.[5]
Rodionov J.
6-16-2
Molcan A.[3]
Mochizuki S.
6-36-2
Moraing M.
Marterer M.
7-652-66-4
Milojevic N.[8]
Ramanathan R.
3-66-16-2
Sousa J.
Forejtek J.
5-76-46-4
Shevchenko A.
Bachinger M.
7-665-1
R32
Mochizuki S.
Ferreira Silva F.
6-32-64-3
Broady L.[6]
Piros Z.
6-36-2
Laaksonen H.[2]
Istomin D.
6-36-3
Lenz J.
Draper J.
7-56-1
Ramanathan R.
Virtanen O.
4-66-46-3
Forejtek J.
Gerasimov E.[4]
4-66-36-4
De Loore J.
Kamke T.
6-36-4
Otte O.[5]
Dzumhur D.
6-26-3
Rodionov J.
Safwat M.
7-56-4
Bachinger M.
Coppejans K.
6-46-4
Molcan A.[3]
Van Rijthoven T.
6-40-67-61
Milojevic N.[8]
Cobolli F.
6-36-2
Marterer M.
Gomez E.
4-66-26-3
Shevchenko A.
Jacquet K.
6-26-1
Sousa J.
Niklas Salminen P.
6-37-69
Moraing M.
Kovalik J.[7]
6-36-4