Harold Mayot vs Michael Geerts — Pau CH Round of 16

Pau CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Harold Mayot
FRA
Harold Mayot
#200ATP
1571ELO
1548Hard ELO
$72kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 15 November 2021
hard
Michael Geerts
BEL
Michael Geerts
#328ATP
1400ELO
1383Hard ELO
31 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWLW
Mayot H.
6-0 4-6 7-6
Geerts M.
Mayot H.
64772
Geerts M.
06651

Harold Mayot defeated Michael Geerts 6-0 4-6 7-6 in the Pau CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Harold Mayot came in ranked #200, defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mayot H.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Geerts M.

Geerts M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Mayot H.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mayot H.Geerts M.
1st serve in·Even
62%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
36%
Break points saved·Even
62%
62%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.3
4.3
Double faults / match·Even
2.6
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mayot H.Geerts M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
29
9
Break points saved·Slight edge
92
82
Break points won·Clear edge
22
3
Deciding sets·Clear edge
32
8
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
8
2

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mayot H.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Geerts M.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.4+165 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.6Hard Elo 1383
7.6Overall Elo 1571
ELO gap
2.4Overall Elo 1400
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.5
Surface form
3.5
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.9
Minutes 14d
6.0
7.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
7.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mayot H.Geerts M.
Freshness·Slight edge
100
89

Mayot H.: 15 days rest · Geerts M.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Albot R.[7]
Lehecka J.
6-27-65
Semi-finals
Lehecka J.
Rune H.[2]
3-66-36-4
Albot R.[7]
Stakhovsky S.
6-26-736-1
Quarter-finals
Lehecka J.
Mayot H.
6-46-2
Albot R.[7]
Lopez F.[1]
6-37-65
Rune H.[2]
Cressy M.[6]
6-26-2
Stakhovsky S.
Gombos N.[5]
6-41-67-65
R16
Cressy M.[6]
Sachko V.
0-66-16-1
Gombos N.[5]
Kotov P.
6-36-4
Mayot H.
Geerts M.
6-04-67-65
Stakhovsky S.
Added D.
6-44-66-4
Albot R.[7]
Kravchenko G.
7-626-4
Lopez F.[1]
Ajdukovic D.
6-34-66-4
Rune H.[2]
Fanselow S.
6-26-2
Lehecka J.
Hemery C.
7-644-67-5
R32
Stakhovsky S.
Novak D.[4]
6-36-1
Kravchenko G.
Giannessi A.
7-54-66-2
Albot R.[7]
Lestienne C.
6-24-66-2
Hemery C.
Janvier M.
6-36-756-3
Cressy M.[6]
Blancaneaux G.
6-34-67-65
Added D.
Diez S.
1-67-626-2
Lopez F.[1]
Fabbiano T.
6-26-1
Ajdukovic D.
Tseng C.
0-67-656-2
Mayot H.
Kolar Z.[8]
6-46-4
Fanselow S.
Moriya H.
7-656-4
Rune H.[2]
Cagnina J.
6-07-5
Sachko V.
Ritschard A.
6-716-16-2
Lehecka J.
Simon G.[3]
6-16-726-2
Geerts M.
Marcora R.
6-46-2
Gombos N.[5]
Debru G.
6-46-1
Kotov P.
Arnaboldi A.
6-26-4