Nicola Kuhn vs Daniel Elahi Galan — Campinas CH Round of 32

Campinas CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GER
Nicola Kuhn
#1540ATP
26 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 November 2021
clay
Daniel Elahi Galan
COL6
Daniel Elahi Galan
#304ATP
1531ELO
1492Clay ELO
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLWWWLWW
Kuhn N.
7-5 6-3
Galan D.
Kuhn N.
762
Galan D.
530

Nicola Kuhn defeated Daniel Elahi Galan 7-5 6-3 in the Campinas CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Daniel Elahi Galan came in ranked #304, leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's semi-final. Nicola Kuhn claimed a first win over Daniel Elahi Galan in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Nicola Kuhn closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–3.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-06-14HalleQ1grassDaniel Elahi Galan7-6(2) 4-6 7-6(4)

Serve vs return

This season
Kuhn N.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Galan D.

Galan D.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Kuhn N.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kuhn N.Galan D.
1st serve in·Even
59%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
59%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.6
5.3
Double faults / match·Even
2.1
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (98 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kuhn N.Galan D.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
14
48
Break points saved·Dominant
56
92
Break points won·Even
17
21
Deciding sets·Dominant
10
55
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
57
66

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kuhn N.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Galan D.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.7
Surface form
4.9
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.2
Minutes 14d
6.8
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
8.5

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Baez S.[7]
Monteiro T.[4]
6-16-4
Semi-finals
Baez S.[7]
Cerundolo F.[8]
4-66-16-2
Monteiro T.[4]
Etcheverry T.
1-66-26-3
Quarter-finals
Baez S.[7]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
2-67-616-1
Monteiro T.[4]
Skatov T.
6-746-37-64
Cerundolo F.[8]
Cerundolo J.[3]
6-17-5
Etcheverry T.
Jarry N.
6-46-1
R16
Cerundolo F.[8]
Meligeni Alves F.
6-26-3
Cerundolo J.[3]
Heide G.
6-13-66-3
Jarry N.
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-16-2
Baez S.[7]
Alvarez N.
6-46-3
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Alvarez Varona N.
7-676-757-5
Etcheverry T.
Kuhn N.
3-66-46-1
Skatov T.
Collarini A.
7-626-2
Monteiro T.[4]
Varillas J.
5-1
R32
Monteiro T.[4]
Nikles J.
6-26-1
Alvarez Varona N.
Luz O.
6-36-4
Alvarez N.
Cachin P.
4-66-46-2
Cerundolo J.[3]
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
4-67-56-1
Heide G.
Londero J.
7-54-66-4
Cerundolo F.[8]
Soares Klier Junior G.
6-36-0
Collarini A.
Cuevas P.[5]
6-36-3
Skatov T.
Olivo R.
6-37-63
Jarry N.
Coria F.[1]
6-26-3
Etcheverry T.
Cid R.
6-26-0
Baez S.[7]
Mena F.
7-606-2
Meligeni Alves F.
Andreozzi G.
6-36-4
Kuhn N.
Galan D.[6]
7-56-3
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Munar J.[2]
6-46-3
Ugo Carabelli C.
Seyboth Wild T.
7-643-1