Feliciano Lopez vs Thomas Fabbiano — Pau CH Round of 32

Pau CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ESP1
Feliciano Lopez
44 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 November 2021
hard
ITA
Thomas Fabbiano
37 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLWL
Lopez F.
6-2 6-1
Fabbiano T.
Lopez F.
662
Fabbiano T.
210

Feliciano Lopez defeated Thomas Fabbiano 6-2 6-1 in the Pau CH round of 32 on hard. Feliciano Lopez extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2019-04-15Monte Carlo MastersQ1clayThomas Fabbiano3-6 6-4 6-2
2016-05-23Roland GarrosR128clayFeliciano Lopez6-4 6-4 3-6 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Lopez F.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Fabbiano T.

Fabbiano T.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Lopez F.

Serve advantage — Fabbiano T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Lopez F.Fabbiano T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
55%
63%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
77%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
64%
59%
Return points won·Slight edge
31%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
10.4
2.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.9
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (71 vs 92). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Lopez F.Fabbiano T.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
51
28
Break points saved·Clear edge
98
81
Break points won·Clear edge
2
16
Deciding sets·Dominant
65
28
Tiebreaks·Dominant
79
44

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Lopez F.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Fabbiano T.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.1
Surface form
3.2
Fatigue & Travel
4.9
Minutes 14d
5.8
4.0
3-set count
0.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Albot R.[7]
Lehecka J.
6-27-65
Semi-finals
Lehecka J.
Rune H.[2]
3-66-36-4
Albot R.[7]
Stakhovsky S.
6-26-736-1
Quarter-finals
Lehecka J.
Mayot H.
6-46-2
Albot R.[7]
Lopez F.[1]
6-37-65
Rune H.[2]
Cressy M.[6]
6-26-2
Stakhovsky S.
Gombos N.[5]
6-41-67-65
R16
Cressy M.[6]
Sachko V.
0-66-16-1
Gombos N.[5]
Kotov P.
6-36-4
Mayot H.
Geerts M.
6-04-67-65
Stakhovsky S.
Added D.
6-44-66-4
Albot R.[7]
Kravchenko G.
7-626-4
Lopez F.[1]
Ajdukovic D.
6-34-66-4
Rune H.[2]
Fanselow S.
6-26-2
Lehecka J.
Hemery C.
7-644-67-5
R32
Stakhovsky S.
Novak D.[4]
6-36-1
Kravchenko G.
Giannessi A.
7-54-66-2
Albot R.[7]
Lestienne C.
6-24-66-2
Hemery C.
Janvier M.
6-36-756-3
Cressy M.[6]
Blancaneaux G.
6-34-67-65
Added D.
Diez S.
1-67-626-2
Lopez F.[1]
Fabbiano T.
6-26-1
Ajdukovic D.
Tseng C.
0-67-656-2
Mayot H.
Kolar Z.[8]
6-46-4
Fanselow S.
Moriya H.
7-656-4
Rune H.[2]
Cagnina J.
6-07-5
Sachko V.
Ritschard A.
6-716-16-2
Lehecka J.
Simon G.[3]
6-16-726-2
Geerts M.
Marcora R.
6-46-2
Gombos N.[5]
Debru G.
6-46-1
Kotov P.
Arnaboldi A.
6-26-4