Nick Chappell vs Emilio Nava — Champaign CH Round of 32

Champaign CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Nick Chappell
#1489ATP
33 yrs · 178 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 November 2021
hard
Emilio Nava
USA
Emilio Nava
#91ATP
1704ELO
1621Hard ELO
$533kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWWW
Chappell N.
6-3 7-6
Nava E.
Chappell N.
6772
Nava E.
3650

Nick Chappell defeated Emilio Nava 6-3 7-6 in the Champaign CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Emilio Nava came in ranked #91.

Key context

  • Match story: Nick Chappell closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Chappell N.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Nava E.

Nava E.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Chappell N.

Serve advantage — Nava E.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Chappell N.Nava E.
—
Serve
40
—
Return
16

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Chappell N.Nava E.
1st serve in·Even
61%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
65%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
59%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
56%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.2
7.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.4
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (148 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Chappell N.Nava E.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
0
52
Break points saved·Dominant
29
94
Break points won·Slight edge
8
17
Deciding sets·Dominant
3
89
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
13
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Chappell N.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Nava E.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.5
Surface form
5.9
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.6
Minutes 14d
4.2
7.0
3-set count
4.0
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Chappell N.Nava E.
Freshness·
—
100

Nava E.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Kozlov S.[8]
Vukic A.[4]
5-76-36-4
Semi-finals
Kozlov S.[8]
Wolf J.[3]
6-26-3
Vukic A.[4]
Watanuki Y.
7-686-4
Quarter-finals
Kozlov S.[8]
Krueger M.[2]
6-46-4
Vukic A.[4]
Soeda G.
6-26-2
Watanuki Y.
Shelton B.
6-26-1
Wolf J.[3]
Kirkov V.
6-36-2
R16
Soeda G.
Jung J.[5]
6-45-76-4
Watanuki Y.
Altmaier D.[1]
6-26-1
Shelton B.
Krstin P.
4-66-06-1
Kozlov S.[8]
Smith K.
6-36-1
Krueger M.[2]
Harrison C.
6-31-66-4
Vukic A.[4]
Brouwer G.
6-46-4
Kirkov V.
Chappell N.
6-26-3
Wolf J.[3]
Uchida K.
6-36-4
R32
Krueger M.[2]
Mejia N.
6-36-3
Wolf J.[3]
Ito T.
6-33-66-3
Kirkov V.
Gunneswaran P.[6]
7-56-1
Soeda G.
Kwiatkowski T.
6-16-4
Brouwer G.
Kovacevic A.
7-53-67-65
Vukic A.[4]
Wu T.
6-36-3
Shelton B.
Rola B.[7]
3-66-46-4
Altmaier D.[1]
Jaziri M.
6-36-4
Krstin P.
Kadhe A.
7-57-5
Watanuki Y.
Galarneau A.
6-44-66-0
Chappell N.
Nava E.
6-37-65
Jung J.[5]
Torpegaard M.
6-23-66-4
Harrison C.
Clark E.
4-66-36-3
Kozlov S.[8]
Aragone J.
3-66-36-4
Smith K.
Mmoh M.
5-3
Uchida K.
Uchiyama Y.
6-43-1