Maxime Cressy vs Geoffrey Blancaneaux — Pau CH Round of 32

Pau CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA6
Maxime Cressy
#1472ATP
29 yrs · 201 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 15 November 2021
hard
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
FRA
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
#390ATP
1387ELO
1375Hard ELO
27 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWWL
Cressy M.
6-3 4-6 7-6
Blancaneaux G.
Cressy M.
64772
Blancaneaux G.
36651

Maxime Cressy defeated Geoffrey Blancaneaux 6-3 4-6 7-6 in the Pau CH round of 32 on hard. Maxime Cressy extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Maxime Cressy closed it out in three sets, 6–3 4–6 7–6.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-02-20MarseilleR32hardMaxime Cressy6-3 6-7(5) 7-6(4)

Serve vs return

This season
Cressy M.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Blancaneaux G.

Blancaneaux G.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Cressy M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Cressy M.Blancaneaux G.
1st serve in·Even
61%
61%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
79%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
68%
59%
Return points won·Slight edge
33%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
13.3
3.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
8.6
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cressy M.Blancaneaux G.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
24
15
Break points saved·Dominant
96
62
Break points won·Clear edge
2
14
Deciding sets·Clear edge
32
19
Tiebreaks·Dominant
8
38

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cressy M.
7.2
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Blancaneaux G.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0
H2H
0.0
8.2
Surface form
4.3
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
0.0
Minutes 14d
7.3
4.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0
Opponent rise
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Cressy M.Blancaneaux G.
Freshness·
—
94

Blancaneaux G.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 14 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Albot R.[7]
Lehecka J.
6-27-65
Semi-finals
Lehecka J.
Rune H.[2]
3-66-36-4
Albot R.[7]
Stakhovsky S.
6-26-736-1
Quarter-finals
Lehecka J.
Mayot H.
6-46-2
Albot R.[7]
Lopez F.[1]
6-37-65
Rune H.[2]
Cressy M.[6]
6-26-2
Stakhovsky S.
Gombos N.[5]
6-41-67-65
R16
Cressy M.[6]
Sachko V.
0-66-16-1
Gombos N.[5]
Kotov P.
6-36-4
Mayot H.
Geerts M.
6-04-67-65
Stakhovsky S.
Added D.
6-44-66-4
Albot R.[7]
Kravchenko G.
7-626-4
Lopez F.[1]
Ajdukovic D.
6-34-66-4
Rune H.[2]
Fanselow S.
6-26-2
Lehecka J.
Hemery C.
7-644-67-5
R32
Stakhovsky S.
Novak D.[4]
6-36-1
Kravchenko G.
Giannessi A.
7-54-66-2
Albot R.[7]
Lestienne C.
6-24-66-2
Hemery C.
Janvier M.
6-36-756-3
Cressy M.[6]
Blancaneaux G.
6-34-67-65
Added D.
Diez S.
1-67-626-2
Lopez F.[1]
Fabbiano T.
6-26-1
Ajdukovic D.
Tseng C.
0-67-656-2
Mayot H.
Kolar Z.[8]
6-46-4
Fanselow S.
Moriya H.
7-656-4
Rune H.[2]
Cagnina J.
6-07-5
Sachko V.
Ritschard A.
6-716-16-2
Lehecka J.
Simon G.[3]
6-16-726-2
Geerts M.
Marcora R.
6-46-2
Gombos N.[5]
Debru G.
6-46-1
Kotov P.
Arnaboldi A.
6-26-4