Sebastian Baez vs Facundo Mena — Campinas CH Round of 32

Campinas CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Sebastian Baez
ARG7
Sebastian Baez
#57ATP
1759ELO
1718Clay ELO
$924kYTD
$6.9MCAREER
25 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 November 2021
clay
Facundo Mena
ARG
Facundo Mena
#354ATP
1427ELO
1406Clay ELO
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLWLL
Baez S.
7-6 6-2
Mena F.
Baez S.
7762
Mena F.
6020

Sebastian Baez defeated Facundo Mena 7-6 6-2 in the Campinas CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Sebastian Baez came in ranked #57, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Baez S.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Mena F.

Mena F.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Baez S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Baez S.Mena F.
1
Serve
—
44
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Baez S.Mena F.
1st serve in·Clear edge
72%
56%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
60%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.0
5.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.8
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Baez S.Mena F.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
87
9
Break points saved·Dominant
96
57
Break points won·Dominant
86
7
Deciding sets·Dominant
88
28
Tiebreaks·Dominant
83
10

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Baez S.
8.0
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Mena F.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.7+312 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.3Clay Elo 1406
8.9Overall Elo 1759
ELO gap
1.1Overall Elo 1427
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
8.5
Surface form
5.9
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.3
Minutes 14d
9.3
0.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Baez S.Mena F.
Freshness·Dominant
94
55

Baez S.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Mena F.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 88 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Baez S.[7]
Monteiro T.[4]
6-16-4
Semi-finals
Baez S.[7]
Cerundolo F.[8]
4-66-16-2
Monteiro T.[4]
Etcheverry T.
1-66-26-3
Quarter-finals
Baez S.[7]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
2-67-616-1
Monteiro T.[4]
Skatov T.
6-746-37-64
Cerundolo F.[8]
Cerundolo J.[3]
6-17-5
Etcheverry T.
Jarry N.
6-46-1
R16
Cerundolo F.[8]
Meligeni Alves F.
6-26-3
Cerundolo J.[3]
Heide G.
6-13-66-3
Jarry N.
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-16-2
Baez S.[7]
Alvarez N.
6-46-3
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Alvarez Varona N.
7-676-757-5
Etcheverry T.
Kuhn N.
3-66-46-1
Skatov T.
Collarini A.
7-626-2
Monteiro T.[4]
Varillas J.
5-1
R32
Monteiro T.[4]
Nikles J.
6-26-1
Alvarez Varona N.
Luz O.
6-36-4
Alvarez N.
Cachin P.
4-66-46-2
Cerundolo J.[3]
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
4-67-56-1
Heide G.
Londero J.
7-54-66-4
Cerundolo F.[8]
Soares Klier Junior G.
6-36-0
Collarini A.
Cuevas P.[5]
6-36-3
Skatov T.
Olivo R.
6-37-63
Jarry N.
Coria F.[1]
6-26-3
Etcheverry T.
Cid R.
6-26-0
Baez S.[7]
Mena F.
7-606-2
Meligeni Alves F.
Andreozzi G.
6-36-4
Kuhn N.
Galan D.[6]
7-56-3
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Munar J.[2]
6-46-3
Ugo Carabelli C.
Seyboth Wild T.
7-643-1