Oscar Otte vs Roberto Marcora — Ortisei CH Round of 32

Ortisei CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GER1
Oscar Otte
#1056ATP
32 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 8 November 2021
hard
ITA
Roberto Marcora
36 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWLLL
Otte O.
7-6 7-6
Marcora R.
Otte O.
77772
Marcora R.
61640

Oscar Otte defeated Roberto Marcora 7-6 7-6 in the Ortisei CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Oscar Otte came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Oscar Otte extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-07-19GstaadQ2clayOscar Otte6-4 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Otte O.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Marcora R.

Marcora R.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Otte O.

Serve advantage — Otte O.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Otte O.Marcora R.
1st serve in·Slight edge
57%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
77%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
60%
Return points won·Even
37%
35%
Break points saved·Even
63%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
9.0
3.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.1
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (163 vs 66). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Otte O.Marcora R.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
41
30
Break points saved·Clear edge
93
78
Break points won·Dominant
30
3
Deciding sets·Dominant
20
58
Tiebreaks·Dominant
80
25

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Otte O.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Marcora R.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
0.0
H2H
10.0
7.8
Surface form
2.1
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
3.9
Minutes 14d
8.8
0.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Otte O.[1]
Cressy M.[2]
7-656-4
Semi-finals
Cressy M.[2]
Basic M.
7-56-2
Otte O.[1]
Draper J.
7-636-4
Quarter-finals
Cressy M.[2]
Copil M.
7-686-4
Otte O.[1]
Peniston R.
6-26-4
Basic M.
Sachko V.
7-633-66-2
Draper J.
Gaio F.[5]
6-767-656-2
R16
Peniston R.
Huesler M.[7]
7-616-4
Basic M.
Halys Q.[3]
7-6126-3
Draper J.
Miedler L.
6-47-61
Copil M.
Fatic N.
7-616-2
Sachko V.
Gojo B.
6-26-4
Cressy M.[2]
Quiroz R.
7-636-4
Otte O.[1]
Bachinger M.
6-36-1
Gaio F.[5]
Stricker D.
7-657-62
R32
Draper J.
Gomez E.[4]
6-46-2
Otte O.[1]
Marcora R.
7-617-64
Gojo B.
Masur D.
6-47-64
Sachko V.
Verdasco F.[6]
7-664-66-3
Peniston R.
Cozbinov A.
6-36-2
Bachinger M.
Simon T.
6-36-797-66
Huesler M.[7]
Moroni G.
6-47-61
Miedler L.
Arnaldi M.
7-696-0
Gaio F.[5]
Kuhn N.
6-37-65
Stricker D.
Viola M.
6-43-67-5
Cressy M.[2]
Van Rijthoven T.
7-667-5
Quiroz R.
Tseng C.
4-66-36-4
Copil M.
Weis A.
6-47-65
Fatic N.
Giannessi A.[8]
6-766-37-5
Halys Q.[3]
Nardi L.
6-46-3
Basic M.
Karlovskiy E.
6-46-3