Zsombor Piros vs Tomas Machac — Bratislava 2 CH Round of 32

Bratislava 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Zsombor Piros
HUN
Zsombor Piros
#169ATP
1661ELO
1629Hard ELO
$145kYTD
$975kCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 8 November 2021
hard
Tomas Machac
CZE8
Tomas Machac
#49ATP
1866ELO
1829Hard ELO
$832kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLWW
Piros Z.
7-5 3-6 6-4
Machac T.
Piros Z.
7362
Machac T.
5641

Zsombor Piros defeated Tomas Machac 7-5 3-6 6-4 in the Bratislava 2 CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Tomas Machac came in ranked #49.

Key context

  • Match story: Zsombor Piros closed it out in three sets, 7–5 3–6 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Piros Z.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Machac T.

Machac T.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Piros Z.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Piros Z.Machac T.
—
Serve
30
—
Return
25

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Piros Z.Machac T.
1st serve in·Even
59%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
54%
Service points won·Even
61%
64%
Return points won·Even
40%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.1
5.0
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Piros Z.Machac T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
54
90
Break points saved·Clear edge
84
98
Break points won·Dominant
32
80
Deciding sets·Slight edge
85
94
Tiebreaks·Dominant
32
97

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Piros Z.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Machac T.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.9Hard Elo 1629
Surface ELO
7.1+200 Hard Elo edge
3.2Overall Elo 1661
ELO gap
6.8Overall Elo 1866
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.8
Surface form
6.2
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.8
Minutes 14d
3.9
4.0
3-set count
0.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Piros Z.Machac T.
Freshness·
50
—

Piros Z.: 1 day rest · 6 matches, 133 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Griekspoor T.[2]
Piros Z.
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Griekspoor T.[2]
Molcan A.[5]
6-756-36-4
Piros Z.
Travaglia S.[1]
7-653-2
Quarter-finals
Travaglia S.[1]
Marterer M.
7-616-1
Molcan A.[5]
Dzumhur D.
6-14-66-3
Griekspoor T.[2]
Lehecka J.
7-636-4
Piros Z.
Ferreira Silva F.
6-06-4
R16
Ferreira Silva F.
Svrcina D.
6-47-5
Marterer M.
Broady L.[7]
6-47-66
Molcan A.[5]
Kamke T.
6-26-2
Piros Z.
Lacko L.
6-26-4
Lehecka J.
Zuk K.
2-66-36-2
Travaglia S.[1]
Ilkel C.
6-46-2
Dzumhur D.
Celikbilek A.
6-46-4
Griekspoor T.[2]
Kalenichenko D.
7-627-61
R32
Griekspoor T.[2]
Pokorny L.
7-646-1
Lehecka J.
Stakhovsky S.
6-47-5
Zuk K.
Mochizuki S.
7-656-3
Dzumhur D.
Gombos N.[4]
6-36-3
Kamke T.
Forejtek J.
6-26-4
Molcan A.[5]
Ramanathan R.
6-37-67
Piros Z.
Machac T.[8]
7-53-66-4
Lacko L.
Karol M.
6-46-3
Svrcina D.
Horansky F.
2-67-656-1
Ferreira Silva F.
Taberner C.[3]
6-27-65
Broady L.[7]
Marchenko I.
6-26-1
Marterer M.
Rodionov J.
4-66-16-4
Ilkel C.
Shevchenko A.
6-46-716-3
Travaglia S.[1]
Kolar Z.
7-646-3
Kalenichenko D.
Palovic L.
7-647-65
Celikbilek A.
Sousa J.
7-666-737-62