Quentin Halys vs Luca Nardi — Ortisei CH Round of 32

Ortisei CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Quentin Halys
FRA3
Quentin Halys
#90ATP
1707ELO
1677Hard ELO
$694kYTD
$5.4MCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 8 November 2021
hard
ITA
Luca Nardi
#160ATP
1585ELO
1572Hard ELO
$213kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
22 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLLWL
Halys Q.
6-4 6-3
Nardi L.
Halys Q.
662
Nardi L.
430

Quentin Halys defeated Luca Nardi 6-4 6-3 in the Ortisei CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Quentin Halys came in ranked #90, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Quentin Halys extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Quentin Halys closed it out in two sets, 6–4 6–3.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-02-24DubaiQFhardQuentin Halys2-6 6-3 7-6(5)

Serve vs return

This season
Halys Q.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Nardi L.

Nardi L.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Halys Q.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Halys Q.Nardi L.
39
Serve
—
26
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Halys Q.Nardi L.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
79%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
67%
62%
Return points won·Slight edge
34%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
11.1
3.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.9
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Halys Q.Nardi L.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
57
32
Break points saved·Slight edge
97
92
Break points won·Slight edge
4
15
Deciding sets·Dominant
75
42
Tiebreaks·Dominant
91
17

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Halys Q.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Nardi L.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.0+105 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.0Hard Elo 1572
5.8Overall Elo 1707
ELO gap
4.2Overall Elo 1585
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.3
Surface form
1.3
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
3.3
Minutes 14d
9.0
0.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Halys Q.Nardi L.
Freshness·Even
93
90

Halys Q.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Nardi L.: 3 days rest · 1 match, 22 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Otte O.[1]
Cressy M.[2]
7-656-4
Semi-finals
Cressy M.[2]
Basic M.
7-56-2
Otte O.[1]
Draper J.
7-636-4
Quarter-finals
Cressy M.[2]
Copil M.
7-686-4
Otte O.[1]
Peniston R.
6-26-4
Basic M.
Sachko V.
7-633-66-2
Draper J.
Gaio F.[5]
6-767-656-2
R16
Peniston R.
Huesler M.[7]
7-616-4
Basic M.
Halys Q.[3]
7-6126-3
Draper J.
Miedler L.
6-47-61
Copil M.
Fatic N.
7-616-2
Sachko V.
Gojo B.
6-26-4
Cressy M.[2]
Quiroz R.
7-636-4
Otte O.[1]
Bachinger M.
6-36-1
Gaio F.[5]
Stricker D.
7-657-62
R32
Draper J.
Gomez E.[4]
6-46-2
Otte O.[1]
Marcora R.
7-617-64
Gojo B.
Masur D.
6-47-64
Sachko V.
Verdasco F.[6]
7-664-66-3
Peniston R.
Cozbinov A.
6-36-2
Bachinger M.
Simon T.
6-36-797-66
Huesler M.[7]
Moroni G.
6-47-61
Miedler L.
Arnaldi M.
7-696-0
Gaio F.[5]
Kuhn N.
6-37-65
Stricker D.
Viola M.
6-43-67-5
Cressy M.[2]
Van Rijthoven T.
7-667-5
Quiroz R.
Tseng C.
4-66-36-4
Copil M.
Weis A.
6-47-65
Fatic N.
Giannessi A.[8]
6-766-37-5
Halys Q.[3]
Nardi L.
6-46-3
Basic M.
Karlovskiy E.
6-46-3