Borna Gojo vs Daniel Masur — Ortisei CH Round of 32

Ortisei CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Borna Gojo
CRO
Borna Gojo
#168ATP
1683ELO
1662Hard ELO
$139kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 8 November 2021
hard
Daniel Masur
GER
Daniel Masur
#386ATP
1413ELO
1383Hard ELO
31 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLWW
Gojo B.
6-4 7-6
Masur D.
Gojo B.
6772
Masur D.
4640

Borna Gojo defeated Daniel Masur 6-4 7-6 in the Ortisei CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Borna Gojo came in ranked #168, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Borna Gojo extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-04-14MunichQ1clayBorna Gojo6-3 7-6(6)

Serve vs return

This season
Gojo B.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Masur D.

Masur D.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Gojo B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gojo B.Masur D.
1st serve in·Even
64%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
67%
63%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
10.5
5.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.8
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gojo B.Masur D.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
53
10
Break points saved·Clear edge
95
73
Break points won·Slight edge
10
5
Deciding sets·Dominant
70
15
Tiebreaks·Dominant
73
13

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gojo B.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Masur D.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.5+280 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.5Hard Elo 1383
8.4Overall Elo 1683
ELO gap
1.6Overall Elo 1413
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.2
Surface form
6.9
Win streak
9.05-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
4.8
3-set count
4.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gojo B.Masur D.
Freshness·Even
100
100

Gojo B.: 20 days rest · Masur D.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Otte O.[1]
Cressy M.[2]
7-656-4
Semi-finals
Cressy M.[2]
Basic M.
7-56-2
Otte O.[1]
Draper J.
7-636-4
Quarter-finals
Cressy M.[2]
Copil M.
7-686-4
Otte O.[1]
Peniston R.
6-26-4
Basic M.
Sachko V.
7-633-66-2
Draper J.
Gaio F.[5]
6-767-656-2
R16
Peniston R.
Huesler M.[7]
7-616-4
Basic M.
Halys Q.[3]
7-6126-3
Draper J.
Miedler L.
6-47-61
Copil M.
Fatic N.
7-616-2
Sachko V.
Gojo B.
6-26-4
Cressy M.[2]
Quiroz R.
7-636-4
Otte O.[1]
Bachinger M.
6-36-1
Gaio F.[5]
Stricker D.
7-657-62
R32
Draper J.
Gomez E.[4]
6-46-2
Otte O.[1]
Marcora R.
7-617-64
Gojo B.
Masur D.
6-47-64
Sachko V.
Verdasco F.[6]
7-664-66-3
Peniston R.
Cozbinov A.
6-36-2
Bachinger M.
Simon T.
6-36-797-66
Huesler M.[7]
Moroni G.
6-47-61
Miedler L.
Arnaldi M.
7-696-0
Gaio F.[5]
Kuhn N.
6-37-65
Stricker D.
Viola M.
6-43-67-5
Cressy M.[2]
Van Rijthoven T.
7-667-5
Quiroz R.
Tseng C.
4-66-36-4
Copil M.
Weis A.
6-47-65
Fatic N.
Giannessi A.[8]
6-766-37-5
Halys Q.[3]
Nardi L.
6-46-3
Basic M.
Karlovskiy E.
6-46-3