Federico Gaio vs Nicola Kuhn — Ortisei CH Round of 32

Ortisei CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ITA5
Federico Gaio
34 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 8 November 2021
hard
GER
Nicola Kuhn
#1540ATP
26 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWW
Gaio F.
6-3 7-6
Kuhn N.
Gaio F.
6772
Kuhn N.
3650

Federico Gaio defeated Nicola Kuhn 6-3 7-6 in the Ortisei CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Federico Gaio came in defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

  • Match story: Federico Gaio closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gaio F.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Kuhn N.

Kuhn N.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Gaio F.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gaio F.Kuhn N.
1st serve in·Even
57%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
53%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.5
3.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.3
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 98). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gaio F.Kuhn N.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
20
14
Break points saved·Clear edge
76
56
Break points won·Clear edge
3
17
Deciding sets·Dominant
40
10
Tiebreaks·Dominant
7
57

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gaio F.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Kuhn N.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
4.1
Surface form
1.6
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
4.9
Minutes 14d
9.2
0.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
7.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Otte O.[1]
Cressy M.[2]
7-656-4
Semi-finals
Cressy M.[2]
Basic M.
7-56-2
Otte O.[1]
Draper J.
7-636-4
Quarter-finals
Cressy M.[2]
Copil M.
7-686-4
Otte O.[1]
Peniston R.
6-26-4
Basic M.
Sachko V.
7-633-66-2
Draper J.
Gaio F.[5]
6-767-656-2
R16
Peniston R.
Huesler M.[7]
7-616-4
Basic M.
Halys Q.[3]
7-6126-3
Draper J.
Miedler L.
6-47-61
Copil M.
Fatic N.
7-616-2
Sachko V.
Gojo B.
6-26-4
Cressy M.[2]
Quiroz R.
7-636-4
Otte O.[1]
Bachinger M.
6-36-1
Gaio F.[5]
Stricker D.
7-657-62
R32
Draper J.
Gomez E.[4]
6-46-2
Otte O.[1]
Marcora R.
7-617-64
Gojo B.
Masur D.
6-47-64
Sachko V.
Verdasco F.[6]
7-664-66-3
Peniston R.
Cozbinov A.
6-36-2
Bachinger M.
Simon T.
6-36-797-66
Huesler M.[7]
Moroni G.
6-47-61
Miedler L.
Arnaldi M.
7-696-0
Gaio F.[5]
Kuhn N.
6-37-65
Stricker D.
Viola M.
6-43-67-5
Cressy M.[2]
Van Rijthoven T.
7-667-5
Quiroz R.
Tseng C.
4-66-36-4
Copil M.
Weis A.
6-47-65
Fatic N.
Giannessi A.[8]
6-766-37-5
Halys Q.[3]
Nardi L.
6-46-3
Basic M.
Karlovskiy E.
6-46-3