Nerman Fatic vs Alessandro Giannessi — Ortisei CH Round of 32

Ortisei CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
BIH
Nerman Fatic
#396ATP
1496ELO
1417Hard ELO
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 8 November 2021
hard
ITA8
Alessandro Giannessi
36 yrs · 185 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLWLW
Fatic N.
6-7 6-3 7-5
Giannessi A.
Fatic N.
66672
Giannessi A.
78351

Nerman Fatic defeated Alessandro Giannessi 6-7 6-3 7-5 in the Ortisei CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Fatic N.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Giannessi A.

Giannessi A.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Fatic N.

Serve advantage — Fatic N.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fatic N.Giannessi A.
1st serve in·Even
63%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
59%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Even
59%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.1
2.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.4
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fatic N.Giannessi A.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
24
36
Break points saved·Clear edge
63
76
Break points won·Clear edge
36
20
Deciding sets·Dominant
24
62
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
35
25

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Fatic N.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Giannessi A.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.6
Surface form
0.8
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.2
Minutes 14d
Prev. match
9.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Otte O.[1]
Cressy M.[2]
7-656-4
Semi-finals
Cressy M.[2]
Basic M.
7-56-2
Otte O.[1]
Draper J.
7-636-4
Quarter-finals
Cressy M.[2]
Copil M.
7-686-4
Otte O.[1]
Peniston R.
6-26-4
Basic M.
Sachko V.
7-633-66-2
Draper J.
Gaio F.[5]
6-767-656-2
R16
Peniston R.
Huesler M.[7]
7-616-4
Basic M.
Halys Q.[3]
7-6126-3
Draper J.
Miedler L.
6-47-61
Copil M.
Fatic N.
7-616-2
Sachko V.
Gojo B.
6-26-4
Cressy M.[2]
Quiroz R.
7-636-4
Otte O.[1]
Bachinger M.
6-36-1
Gaio F.[5]
Stricker D.
7-657-62
R32
Draper J.
Gomez E.[4]
6-46-2
Otte O.[1]
Marcora R.
7-617-64
Gojo B.
Masur D.
6-47-64
Sachko V.
Verdasco F.[6]
7-664-66-3
Peniston R.
Cozbinov A.
6-36-2
Bachinger M.
Simon T.
6-36-797-66
Huesler M.[7]
Moroni G.
6-47-61
Miedler L.
Arnaldi M.
7-696-0
Gaio F.[5]
Kuhn N.
6-37-65
Stricker D.
Viola M.
6-43-67-5
Cressy M.[2]
Van Rijthoven T.
7-667-5
Quiroz R.
Tseng C.
4-66-36-4
Copil M.
Weis A.
6-47-65
Fatic N.
Giannessi A.[8]
6-766-37-5
Halys Q.[3]
Nardi L.
6-46-3
Basic M.
Karlovskiy E.
6-46-3