Marius Copil vs Alexander Weis — Ortisei CH Round of 32

Ortisei CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ROU
Marius Copil
35 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 8 November 2021
hard
ITA
Alexander Weis
#620ATP
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLWLWL
Copil M.
6-4 7-6
Weis A.
Copil M.
6772
Weis A.
4650

Marius Copil defeated Alexander Weis 6-4 7-6 in the Ortisei CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Copil M.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Weis A.

Weis A.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Copil M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Copil M.Weis A.
1st serve in·Even
59%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
60%
Return points won·Even
35%
39%
Break points saved·Even
62%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.3
2.6
Double faults / match·Even
3.0
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (154 vs 124). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Copil M.Weis A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
47
4
Break points saved·Dominant
91
50
Break points won·Slight edge
3
13
Deciding sets·Dominant
63
16
Tiebreaks·Dominant
79
8

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Copil M.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Weis A.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.7
Surface form
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
7.3
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Otte O.[1]
Cressy M.[2]
7-656-4
Semi-finals
Cressy M.[2]
Basic M.
7-56-2
Otte O.[1]
Draper J.
7-636-4
Quarter-finals
Cressy M.[2]
Copil M.
7-686-4
Otte O.[1]
Peniston R.
6-26-4
Basic M.
Sachko V.
7-633-66-2
Draper J.
Gaio F.[5]
6-767-656-2
R16
Peniston R.
Huesler M.[7]
7-616-4
Basic M.
Halys Q.[3]
7-6126-3
Draper J.
Miedler L.
6-47-61
Copil M.
Fatic N.
7-616-2
Sachko V.
Gojo B.
6-26-4
Cressy M.[2]
Quiroz R.
7-636-4
Otte O.[1]
Bachinger M.
6-36-1
Gaio F.[5]
Stricker D.
7-657-62
R32
Draper J.
Gomez E.[4]
6-46-2
Otte O.[1]
Marcora R.
7-617-64
Gojo B.
Masur D.
6-47-64
Sachko V.
Verdasco F.[6]
7-664-66-3
Peniston R.
Cozbinov A.
6-36-2
Bachinger M.
Simon T.
6-36-797-66
Huesler M.[7]
Moroni G.
6-47-61
Miedler L.
Arnaldi M.
7-696-0
Gaio F.[5]
Kuhn N.
6-37-65
Stricker D.
Viola M.
6-43-67-5
Cressy M.[2]
Van Rijthoven T.
7-667-5
Quiroz R.
Tseng C.
4-66-36-4
Copil M.
Weis A.
6-47-65
Fatic N.
Giannessi A.[8]
6-766-37-5
Halys Q.[3]
Nardi L.
6-46-3
Basic M.
Karlovskiy E.
6-46-3