Maxime Cressy vs Marius Copil — Ortisei CH Quarter-final

Ortisei CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
USA2
Maxime Cressy
#1472ATP
29 yrs · 201 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 8 November 2021
hard
ROU
Marius Copil
35 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLW
Cressy M.
7-6 6-4
Copil M.
Cressy M.
71062
Copil M.
6840

Maxime Cressy defeated Marius Copil 7-6 6-4 in the Ortisei CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Maxime Cressy came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cressy M.serving92% hold

wins 72% of points on serve vs Copil M.

Copil M.serving92% hold

wins 72% of points on serve vs Cressy M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Cressy M.Copil M.
1st serve in·Even
61%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
79%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
68%
66%
Return points won·Even
33%
35%
Break points saved·Even
65%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
13.2
8.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
8.6
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 154). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cressy M.Copil M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
24
47
Break points saved·Slight edge
96
91
Break points won·Even
2
3
Deciding sets·Dominant
32
63
Tiebreaks·Dominant
8
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cressy M.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Copil M.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.1
Surface form
5.7
7.04-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
0.0
Minutes 14d
7.3
0.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Otte O.[1]
Cressy M.[2]
7-656-4
Semi-finals
Cressy M.[2]
Basic M.
7-56-2
Otte O.[1]
Draper J.
7-636-4
Quarter-finals
Cressy M.[2]
Copil M.
7-686-4
Otte O.[1]
Peniston R.
6-26-4
Basic M.
Sachko V.
7-633-66-2
Draper J.
Gaio F.[5]
6-767-656-2
R16
Peniston R.
Huesler M.[7]
7-616-4
Basic M.
Halys Q.[3]
7-6126-3
Draper J.
Miedler L.
6-47-61
Copil M.
Fatic N.
7-616-2
Sachko V.
Gojo B.
6-26-4
Cressy M.[2]
Quiroz R.
7-636-4
Otte O.[1]
Bachinger M.
6-36-1
Gaio F.[5]
Stricker D.
7-657-62
R32
Draper J.
Gomez E.[4]
6-46-2
Otte O.[1]
Marcora R.
7-617-64
Gojo B.
Masur D.
6-47-64
Sachko V.
Verdasco F.[6]
7-664-66-3
Peniston R.
Cozbinov A.
6-36-2
Bachinger M.
Simon T.
6-36-797-66
Huesler M.[7]
Moroni G.
6-47-61
Miedler L.
Arnaldi M.
7-696-0
Gaio F.[5]
Kuhn N.
6-37-65
Stricker D.
Viola M.
6-43-67-5
Cressy M.[2]
Van Rijthoven T.
7-667-5
Quiroz R.
Tseng C.
4-66-36-4
Copil M.
Weis A.
6-47-65
Fatic N.
Giannessi A.[8]
6-766-37-5
Halys Q.[3]
Nardi L.
6-46-3
Basic M.
Karlovskiy E.
6-46-3