Mirza Basic vs Quentin Halys — Ortisei CH Round of 16

Ortisei CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Mirza Basic
BIH
Mirza Basic
#602ATP
35 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 8 November 2021
hard
Quentin Halys
FRA3
Quentin Halys
#90ATP
1707ELO
1677Hard ELO
$694kYTD
$5.4MCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLWWL
Basic M.
7-6 6-3
Halys Q.
Basic M.
71462
Halys Q.
61230

Mirza Basic defeated Quentin Halys 7-6 6-3 in the Ortisei CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Quentin Halys came in ranked #90.

Key context

  • Match story: Mirza Basic closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Basic M.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Halys Q.

Halys Q.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Basic M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Basic M.Halys Q.
—
Serve
39
—
Return
26

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Basic M.Halys Q.
1st serve in·Even
62%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
79%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
67%
Return points won·Even
38%
34%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.3
11.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.6
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (164 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Basic M.Halys Q.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
33
57
Break points saved·Dominant
56
97
Break points won·Even
4
4
Deciding sets·Slight edge
66
75
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
67
91

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Basic M.
4.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Halys Q.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.4
Surface form
5.3
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.1
Minutes 14d
3.3
3-set count
0.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Basic M.Halys Q.
Freshness·
—
93

Halys Q.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Otte O.[1]
Cressy M.[2]
7-656-4
Semi-finals
Cressy M.[2]
Basic M.
7-56-2
Otte O.[1]
Draper J.
7-636-4
Quarter-finals
Cressy M.[2]
Copil M.
7-686-4
Otte O.[1]
Peniston R.
6-26-4
Basic M.
Sachko V.
7-633-66-2
Draper J.
Gaio F.[5]
6-767-656-2
R16
Peniston R.
Huesler M.[7]
7-616-4
Basic M.
Halys Q.[3]
7-6126-3
Draper J.
Miedler L.
6-47-61
Copil M.
Fatic N.
7-616-2
Sachko V.
Gojo B.
6-26-4
Cressy M.[2]
Quiroz R.
7-636-4
Otte O.[1]
Bachinger M.
6-36-1
Gaio F.[5]
Stricker D.
7-657-62
R32
Draper J.
Gomez E.[4]
6-46-2
Otte O.[1]
Marcora R.
7-617-64
Gojo B.
Masur D.
6-47-64
Sachko V.
Verdasco F.[6]
7-664-66-3
Peniston R.
Cozbinov A.
6-36-2
Bachinger M.
Simon T.
6-36-797-66
Huesler M.[7]
Moroni G.
6-47-61
Miedler L.
Arnaldi M.
7-696-0
Gaio F.[5]
Kuhn N.
6-37-65
Stricker D.
Viola M.
6-43-67-5
Cressy M.[2]
Van Rijthoven T.
7-667-5
Quiroz R.
Tseng C.
4-66-36-4
Copil M.
Weis A.
6-47-65
Fatic N.
Giannessi A.[8]
6-766-37-5
Halys Q.[3]
Nardi L.
6-46-3
Basic M.
Karlovskiy E.
6-46-3