Xin Yu Wang vs Kateryna Baindl — Linz Round of 32

Linz · WTA · Round of 32
CHN
Xin Yu Wang
1760ELO
1716Hard ELO
24 yrs · 182 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 8 November 2021
hard
UKR
Kateryna Baindl
32 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWLL
Wang X.
2-6 6-2 6-3
Baindl K.
Wang X.
2662
Baindl K.
6231

Xin Yu Wang defeated Kateryna Baindl 2-6 6-2 6-3 in the Linz round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Wang X.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Baindl K.

Baindl K.serving67% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Wang X.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Wang X.Baindl K.
25
Serve
—
40
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Wang X.Baindl K.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
72%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
58%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
44%
Service points won·Even
58%
54%
Return points won·Even
43%
46%
Break points saved·Even
56%
55%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.6
1.2
Double faults / match·Even
3.3
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 127). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Wang X.Baindl K.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
60
9
Break points saved·Dominant
86
20
Break points won·Even
78
76
Deciding sets·Dominant
86
5
Tiebreaks·Dominant
4
71

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Wang X.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Baindl K.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.4
Surface form
3.1
Fatigue & Travel
7.6
Minutes 14d
8.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Weather
8°CMainly clear
Wind 13 km/hHumidity 74%

Draw

Final
Riske Amritraj A.[8]
Cristian J.
2-66-27-5
Semi-finals
Cristian J.
Halep S.[2]
W/O
Riske Amritraj A.[8]
Collins D.[3]
7-5
Quarter-finals
Collins D.[3]
Van Uytvanck A.
7-56-3
Riske Amritraj A.[8]
Wang X.
6-37-5
Cristian J.
Kudermetova V.[4]
6-37-65
Halep S.[2]
Paolini J.[7]
4-67-56-0
R16
Cristian J.
Peterson R.
5-2
Halep S.[2]
Sasnovich A.
7-56-3
Wang X.
Raducanu E.[1]
6-16-707-5
Paolini J.[7]
Zheng S.
6-12-66-4
Collins D.[3]
Minnen G.
6-16-2
Riske Amritraj A.[8]
Cornet A.
6-46-4
Van Uytvanck A.
Tsurenko L.
6-06-3
Kudermetova V.[4]
Kalinina A.
4-66-46-2
R32
Zheng S.
Burel C.
6-46-1
Sasnovich A.
Ferro F.
6-23-66-2
Cornet A.
Grabher J.
7-676-4
Cristian J.
Rakhimova K.
2-66-27-5
Peterson R.
Tan H.
6-26-4
Kalinina A.
Trevisan M.
6-36-4
Wang X.
Baindl K.
2-66-26-3
Riske Amritraj A.[8]
Barthel M.
6-36-1
Minnen G.
Dodin O.
6-46-3
Van Uytvanck A.
Kraus S.
6-16-0
Tsurenko L.
Alexandrova E.[5]
6-47-62
Paolini J.[7]
Yastremska D.
6-43-66-2