Jack Sock vs Cedrik Marcel Stebe — Charlottesville CH Round of 16

Charlottesville CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
USA4
Jack Sock
33 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 1 November 2021
hard
Cedrik Marcel Stebe
GER
Cedrik Marcel Stebe
#366ATP
1556ELO
1523Hard ELO
35 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWWW
Sock J.
6-2 6-3
Stebe C.
Sock J.
662
Stebe C.
230

Jack Sock defeated Cedrik Marcel Stebe 6-2 6-3 in the Charlottesville CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Sock J.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Stebe C.

Stebe C.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Sock J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sock J.Stebe C.
1st serve in·Even
61%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
59%
Return points won·Slight edge
36%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.3
3.1
Double faults / match·Even
3.5
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (98 vs 125). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sock J.Stebe C.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
67
51
Break points saved·Clear edge
96
75
Break points won·Clear edge
28
10
Deciding sets·Even
86
86
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
82
68

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Sock J.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Stebe C.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.5
Surface form
3.3
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.2
6.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Kozlov S.
Vukic A.
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Kozlov S.
Wolf J.
6-16-716-0
Vukic A.
Schnur B.
6-46-1
Quarter-finals
Kozlov S.
Nava E.
6-46-2
Vukic A.
Sock J.[4]
6-47-5
Wolf J.
Kwiatkowski T.
7-56-4
Schnur B.
Gunneswaran P.
7-56-3
R16
Schnur B.
Harrison C.
7-616-747-66
Sock J.[4]
Stebe C.
6-26-3
Vukic A.
Wu T.
3-66-36-2
Kwiatkowski T.
Watanuki Y.
7-646-1
Nava E.
Soeda G.
2-67-656-2
Kozlov S.
Kubler J.
6-36-1
Wolf J.
Kudla D.
6-27-65
Gunneswaran P.
Montes De La Torre I.
6-17-5
R32
Kudla D.
Krueger M.[3]
6-36-2
Vukic A.
Popko D.[5]
6-37-5
Watanuki Y.
Eubanks C.
6-22-66-4
Kozlov S.
Fratangelo B.[7]
7-56-2
Kubler J.
Von Der Schulenburg J.
7-657-5
Soeda G.
Ito T.
7-607-5
Nava E.
Pospisil V.[1]
6-44-67-63
Gunneswaran P.
Daniel T.[2]
6-727-656-2
Wu T.
Chappell N.
6-46-3
Wolf J.
Damm M.
7-56-4
Kwiatkowski T.
Rola B.[8]
7-632-67-5
Montes De La Torre I.
Polansky P.
6-34-67-65
Schnur B.
Uchiyama Y.
2-66-26-0
Harrison C.
Jung J.[6]
7-56-4
Sock J.[4]
Torpegaard M.
6-46-4
Stebe C.
Mmoh M.
6-46-716-2