Dominic Stricker vs Jurij Rodionov — Eckental CH Round of 32

Eckental CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Dominic Stricker
SUI
Dominic Stricker
#360ATP
1533ELO
1509Hard ELO
23 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLWLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 1 November 2021
hard
Jurij Rodionov
AUT3
Jurij Rodionov
#143ATP
1636ELO
1584Hard ELO
$205kYTD
$1.7MCAREER
27 yrs · 191 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWWWL
Stricker D.
5-7 7-6 6-4
Rodionov J.
Stricker D.
57762
Rodionov J.
76541

Dominic Stricker defeated Jurij Rodionov 5-7 7-6 6-4 in the Eckental CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Jurij Rodionov came in ranked #143, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Stricker D.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Rodionov J.

Rodionov J.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Stricker D.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Stricker D.Rodionov J.
1st serve in·Even
57%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
75%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
65%
63%
Return points won·Even
36%
38%
Break points saved·Even
62%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.7
4.9
Double faults / match·Even
3.0
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Stricker D.Rodionov J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
58
40
Break points saved·Even
92
89
Break points won·Slight edge
9
17
Deciding sets·Dominant
86
45
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
74
54

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Stricker D.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Rodionov J.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.3Hard Elo 1509
Surface ELO
5.7+75 Hard Elo edge
4.3Overall Elo 1533
ELO gap
5.7Overall Elo 1636
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.1
Surface form
2.5
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.9
Minutes 14d
8.5
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Stricker D.Rodionov J.
Freshness·Clear edge
88
75

Stricker D.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 18 games (7d) · Rodionov J.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 32 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Masur D.
Cressy M.[6]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Cressy M.[6]
Machac T.[5]
6-33-67-65
Masur D.
Huesler M.
6-26-3
Quarter-finals
Cressy M.[6]
Vesely J.[2]
7-607-63
Huesler M.
Thompson J.[1]
6-36-1
Masur D.
Ramanathan R.
6-36-3
Machac T.[5]
Stricker D.
6-46-4
R16
Thompson J.[1]
Bemelmans R.
6-13-1
Machac T.[5]
Squire H.
6-27-64
Cressy M.[6]
Blancaneaux G.
6-36-4
Vesely J.[2]
Vavassori A.
6-46-1
Ramanathan R.
Marterer M.
7-57-64
Huesler M.
Miedler L.
3-66-26-1
Stricker D.
Copil M.
7-636-2
Masur D.
Basic M.
6-36-4
R32
Vesely J.[2]
Forejtek J.
6-15-77-5
Blancaneaux G.
Furness E.
6-16-1
Copil M.
Sachko V.
2-66-26-4
Squire H.
Erler A.
7-632-67-65
Basic M.
Moeller M.
6-27-5
Masur D.
Otte O.[4]
6-26-736-4
Huesler M.
Heyman C.
6-16-1
Stricker D.
Rodionov J.[3]
5-77-656-4
Bemelmans R.
Simon T.
6-766-37-5
Vavassori A.
Bachinger M.
6-43-66-3
Machac T.[5]
Draper J.
7-654-66-4
Miedler L.
Rehberg M.
6-36-4
Marterer M.
Zuk K.[8]
6-36-4
Thompson J.[1]
Rosenkranz M.
7-56-727-65
Cressy M.[6]
Haerteis J.
6-716-46-3
Ramanathan R.
Setkic A.
7-674-66-3