Emilio Nava vs Go Soeda — Charlottesville CH Round of 16

Charlottesville CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Emilio Nava
USA
Emilio Nava
#91ATP
1704ELO
1621Hard ELO
$533kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 1 November 2021
hard
JPN
Go Soeda
41 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWW
Nava E.
2-6 7-6 6-2
Soeda G.
Nava E.
27762
Soeda G.
66521

Emilio Nava defeated Go Soeda 2-6 7-6 6-2 in the Charlottesville CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nava E.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Soeda G.

Soeda G.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Nava E.

Serve advantage — Nava E.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Nava E.Soeda G.
40
Serve
—
16
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Nava E.Soeda G.
1st serve in·Even
63%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
64%
60%
Return points won·Even
37%
35%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
54%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.7
2.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.0
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 45). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nava E.Soeda G.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
52
23
Break points saved·Dominant
94
61
Break points won·Even
17
14
Deciding sets·Dominant
89
46
Tiebreaks·Even
23
26

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nava E.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Soeda G.
4.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.2
Surface form
0.9
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 5
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nava E.Soeda G.
Freshness·
100
—

Nava E.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Kozlov S.
Vukic A.
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Kozlov S.
Wolf J.
6-16-716-0
Vukic A.
Schnur B.
6-46-1
Quarter-finals
Kozlov S.
Nava E.
6-46-2
Vukic A.
Sock J.[4]
6-47-5
Wolf J.
Kwiatkowski T.
7-56-4
Schnur B.
Gunneswaran P.
7-56-3
R16
Schnur B.
Harrison C.
7-616-747-66
Sock J.[4]
Stebe C.
6-26-3
Vukic A.
Wu T.
3-66-36-2
Kwiatkowski T.
Watanuki Y.
7-646-1
Nava E.
Soeda G.
2-67-656-2
Kozlov S.
Kubler J.
6-36-1
Wolf J.
Kudla D.
6-27-65
Gunneswaran P.
Montes De La Torre I.
6-17-5
R32
Kudla D.
Krueger M.[3]
6-36-2
Vukic A.
Popko D.[5]
6-37-5
Watanuki Y.
Eubanks C.
6-22-66-4
Kozlov S.
Fratangelo B.[7]
7-56-2
Kubler J.
Von Der Schulenburg J.
7-657-5
Soeda G.
Ito T.
7-607-5
Nava E.
Pospisil V.[1]
6-44-67-63
Gunneswaran P.
Daniel T.[2]
6-727-656-2
Wu T.
Chappell N.
6-46-3
Wolf J.
Damm M.
7-56-4
Kwiatkowski T.
Rola B.[8]
7-632-67-5
Montes De La Torre I.
Polansky P.
6-34-67-65
Schnur B.
Uchiyama Y.
2-66-26-0
Harrison C.
Jung J.[6]
7-56-4
Sock J.[4]
Torpegaard M.
6-46-4
Stebe C.
Mmoh M.
6-46-716-2