Emilio Nava vs Vasek Pospisil — Charlottesville CH Round of 32

Charlottesville CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Emilio Nava
USA
Emilio Nava
#91ATP
1704ELO
1621Hard ELO
$533kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 1 November 2021
hard
CAN1
Vasek Pospisil
36 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
Nava E.
6-4 4-6 7-6
Pospisil V.
Nava E.
64772
Pospisil V.
46631

Emilio Nava defeated Vasek Pospisil 6-4 4-6 7-6 in the Charlottesville CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nava E.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Pospisil V.

Pospisil V.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Nava E.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Nava E.Pospisil V.
40
Serve
—
16
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Nava E.Pospisil V.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
56%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
77%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
48%
Service points won·Even
64%
65%
Return points won·Even
37%
35%
Break points saved·Even
64%
65%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.7
9.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
4.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 138). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nava E.Pospisil V.
Clutch Rating·Even
52
49
Break points saved·Even
94
96
Break points won·Slight edge
17
7
Deciding sets·Dominant
89
62
Tiebreaks·Dominant
23
72

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nava E.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Pospisil V.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Injury return: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.2
Surface form
3.1
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nava E.Pospisil V.
Freshness·
100
—

Nava E.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Kozlov S.
Vukic A.
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Kozlov S.
Wolf J.
6-16-716-0
Vukic A.
Schnur B.
6-46-1
Quarter-finals
Kozlov S.
Nava E.
6-46-2
Vukic A.
Sock J.[4]
6-47-5
Wolf J.
Kwiatkowski T.
7-56-4
Schnur B.
Gunneswaran P.
7-56-3
R16
Schnur B.
Harrison C.
7-616-747-66
Sock J.[4]
Stebe C.
6-26-3
Vukic A.
Wu T.
3-66-36-2
Kwiatkowski T.
Watanuki Y.
7-646-1
Nava E.
Soeda G.
2-67-656-2
Kozlov S.
Kubler J.
6-36-1
Wolf J.
Kudla D.
6-27-65
Gunneswaran P.
Montes De La Torre I.
6-17-5
R32
Kudla D.
Krueger M.[3]
6-36-2
Vukic A.
Popko D.[5]
6-37-5
Watanuki Y.
Eubanks C.
6-22-66-4
Kozlov S.
Fratangelo B.[7]
7-56-2
Kubler J.
Von Der Schulenburg J.
7-657-5
Soeda G.
Ito T.
7-607-5
Nava E.
Pospisil V.[1]
6-44-67-63
Gunneswaran P.
Daniel T.[2]
6-727-656-2
Wu T.
Chappell N.
6-46-3
Wolf J.
Damm M.
7-56-4
Kwiatkowski T.
Rola B.[8]
7-632-67-5
Montes De La Torre I.
Polansky P.
6-34-67-65
Schnur B.
Uchiyama Y.
2-66-26-0
Harrison C.
Jung J.[6]
7-56-4
Sock J.[4]
Torpegaard M.
6-46-4
Stebe C.
Mmoh M.
6-46-716-2