Cedrik Marcel Stebe vs Michael Mmoh — Charlottesville CH Round of 32

Charlottesville CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Cedrik Marcel Stebe
GER
Cedrik Marcel Stebe
#366ATP
1556ELO
1523Hard ELO
35 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 1 November 2021
hard
Michael Mmoh
USA
Michael Mmoh
#188ATP
1613ELO
1599Hard ELO
$85kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWWWL
Stebe C.
6-4 6-7 6-2
Mmoh M.
Stebe C.
66162
Mmoh M.
47721

Cedrik Marcel Stebe defeated Michael Mmoh 6-4 6-7 6-2 in the Charlottesville CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Stebe C.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Mmoh M.

Mmoh M.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Stebe C.

Serve advantage — Mmoh M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Stebe C.Mmoh M.
1st serve in·Even
61%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
47%
Service points won·Even
59%
63%
Return points won·Even
41%
39%
Break points saved·Even
58%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.2
6.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.3
3.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (125 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Stebe C.Mmoh M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
51
66
Break points saved·Clear edge
75
91
Break points won·Clear edge
10
31
Deciding sets·Even
86
90
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
68
77

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Stebe C.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Mmoh M.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.1Hard Elo 1523
Surface ELO
5.9+76 Hard Elo edge
4.2Overall Elo 1556
ELO gap
5.8Overall Elo 1613
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.3
Surface form
5.8
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.2
Minutes 14d
6.8
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Stebe C.Mmoh M.
Freshness·
—
95

Mmoh M.: 13 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Kozlov S.
Vukic A.
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Kozlov S.
Wolf J.
6-16-716-0
Vukic A.
Schnur B.
6-46-1
Quarter-finals
Kozlov S.
Nava E.
6-46-2
Vukic A.
Sock J.[4]
6-47-5
Wolf J.
Kwiatkowski T.
7-56-4
Schnur B.
Gunneswaran P.
7-56-3
R16
Schnur B.
Harrison C.
7-616-747-66
Sock J.[4]
Stebe C.
6-26-3
Vukic A.
Wu T.
3-66-36-2
Kwiatkowski T.
Watanuki Y.
7-646-1
Nava E.
Soeda G.
2-67-656-2
Kozlov S.
Kubler J.
6-36-1
Wolf J.
Kudla D.
6-27-65
Gunneswaran P.
Montes De La Torre I.
6-17-5
R32
Kudla D.
Krueger M.[3]
6-36-2
Vukic A.
Popko D.[5]
6-37-5
Watanuki Y.
Eubanks C.
6-22-66-4
Kozlov S.
Fratangelo B.[7]
7-56-2
Kubler J.
Von Der Schulenburg J.
7-657-5
Soeda G.
Ito T.
7-607-5
Nava E.
Pospisil V.[1]
6-44-67-63
Gunneswaran P.
Daniel T.[2]
6-727-656-2
Wu T.
Chappell N.
6-46-3
Wolf J.
Damm M.
7-56-4
Kwiatkowski T.
Rola B.[8]
7-632-67-5
Montes De La Torre I.
Polansky P.
6-34-67-65
Schnur B.
Uchiyama Y.
2-66-26-0
Harrison C.
Jung J.[6]
7-56-4
Sock J.[4]
Torpegaard M.
6-46-4
Stebe C.
Mmoh M.
6-46-716-2