Alex Molcan vs Zdenek Kolar — Bergamo CH Quarter-final

Bergamo CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Alex Molcan
SVK1
Alex Molcan
#101ATP
1742ELO
1653Hard ELO
$295kYTD
$2.7MCAREER
28 yrs · 178 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 1 November 2021
hard
Zdenek Kolar
CZE6
Zdenek Kolar
#153ATP
1506ELO
1432Hard ELO
$121kYTD
$1.3MCAREER
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLLLW
Molcan A.
6-4 6-4
Kolar Z.
Molcan A.
662
Kolar Z.
440

Alex Molcan defeated Zdenek Kolar 6-4 6-4 in the Bergamo CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Alex Molcan came in ranked #101, defending last year's round of 64.

Key context

  • Match story: Alex Molcan edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Molcan A.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Kolar Z.

Kolar Z.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Molcan A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Molcan A.Kolar Z.
1st serve in·Even
64%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
60%
Return points won·Even
40%
41%
Break points saved·Even
59%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.9
2.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.4
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Molcan A.Kolar Z.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
79
26
Break points saved·Dominant
90
53
Break points won·Dominant
61
28
Deciding sets·Dominant
91
58
Tiebreaks·Dominant
91
8

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Molcan A.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Kolar Z.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.7+221 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.3Hard Elo 1432
7.9Overall Elo 1742
ELO gap
2.1Overall Elo 1506
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.6
Surface form
5.8
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Minutes 14d
8.4
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Molcan A.Kolar Z.
Freshness·Even
93
90

Molcan A.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Kolar Z.: 5 days rest · 1 match, 19 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Rune H.[3]
Ilkel C.
7-57-66
Semi-finals
Rune H.[3]
Molcan A.[1]
7-51-66-4
Ilkel C.
Marozsan F.
7-625-76-4
Quarter-finals
Marozsan F.
Novak D.[2]
7-56-1
Rune H.[3]
Dzumhur D.[8]
7-692-66-1
Molcan A.[1]
Kolar Z.[6]
6-46-4
Ilkel C.
Broady L.[5]
7-53-66-1
R16
Novak D.[2]
Donskoy E.
6-32-66-1
Marozsan F.
Stakhovsky S.
7-56-2
Rune H.[3]
Horansky F.
5-76-46-2
Molcan A.[1]
Fatic N.
6-16-4
Dzumhur D.[8]
Lehecka J.
6-46-4
Broady L.[5]
Marchenko I.
6-44-66-3
Kolar Z.[6]
Oconnell C.
5-77-657-5
Ilkel C.
Albot R.[4]
7-56-3
R32
Novak D.[2]
Marcora R.
7-647-62
Kolar Z.[6]
Kukushkin M.
6-36-1
Broady L.[5]
Petrovic D.
6-33-66-3
Dzumhur D.[8]
Cobolli F.
6-47-5
Donskoy E.
Gaio F.
6-36-3
Albot R.[4]
Janvier M.
5-77-56-4
Oconnell C.
Maden Y.
6-37-65
Ilkel C.
Kotov P.
4-66-17-65
Stakhovsky S.
Arnaldi M.
6-36-747-65
Marozsan F.
Milojevic N.[7]
4-66-16-3
Marchenko I.
Nardi L.
7-616-4
Lehecka J.
Grenier H.
6-37-5
Horansky F.
Potenza L.
6-46-3
Rune H.[3]
Bourgue M.
6-36-4
Fatic N.
Safwat M.
6-46-2
Molcan A.[1]
Serdarusic N.
6-746-46-2