Cem Ilkel vs Pavel Kotov — Bergamo CH Round of 32
Bergamo CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 1 November 2021
hard
Umpiry Score
Pre-match6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limitedForm & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H5.0
4.6
Surface form4.5
0.0
Win streak0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.6
Minutes 14d7.0
3-set count7.0
Prev. matchContext
7.0
Defending pts5.0
The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.
Ilkel C.
46772
Kotov P.
61651
Head to head
No previous meetings on record.
Statistics
Recent form56%1st serve in+8%64%
70%1st serve points won+8%78%
51%2nd serve points won+2%53%
62%Service points won+7%69%
37%Return points won+1%38%
59%Break points saved+2%61%
4.4Aces / match+2.67
2.1Double faults / match+0.41.7
Averages from each player's recent completed matches (20 vs 20). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Draw
Quarter-finals
Molcan A.[1]
Kolar Z.[6]
6-46-4
Marozsan F.
Novak D.[2]
7-56-1
Rune H.[3]
Dzumhur D.[8]
7-692-66-1
Ilkel C.
Broady L.[5]
7-53-66-1
R16
Rune H.[3]
Horansky F.
5-76-46-2
Molcan A.[1]
Fatic N.
6-16-4
Ilkel C.
Albot R.[4]
7-56-3
Dzumhur D.[8]
Lehecka J.
6-46-4
Broady L.[5]
Marchenko I.
6-44-66-3
Kolar Z.[6]
Oconnell C.
5-77-657-5
Novak D.[2]
Donskoy E.
6-32-66-1
Marozsan F.
Stakhovsky S.
7-56-2
R32
Broady L.[5]
Petrovic D.
6-33-66-3
Dzumhur D.[8]
Cobolli F.
6-47-5
Lehecka J.
Grenier H.
6-37-5
Molcan A.[1]
Serdarusic N.
6-746-46-2
Donskoy E.
Gaio F.
6-36-3
Novak D.[2]
Marcora R.
7-647-62
Horansky F.
Potenza L.
6-46-3
Stakhovsky S.
Arnaldi M.
6-36-747-65
Fatic N.
Safwat M.
6-46-2
Albot R.[4]
Janvier M.
5-77-56-4
Marozsan F.
Milojevic N.[7]
4-66-16-3
Oconnell C.
Maden Y.
6-37-65
Marchenko I.
Nardi L.
7-616-4
Rune H.[3]
Bourgue M.
6-36-4
Ilkel C.
Kotov P.
4-66-17-65
Kolar Z.[6]
Kukushkin M.
6-36-1