Holger Rune vs Filip Horansky — Bergamo CH Round of 16

Bergamo CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Holger Rune
DEN3
Holger Rune
#81ATP
1757ELO
1725Hard ELO
$0YTD
$16MCAREER
23 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 1 November 2021
hard
SVK
Filip Horansky
33 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLW
Rune H.
5-7 6-4 6-2
Horansky F.
Rune H.
5662
Horansky F.
7421

Holger Rune defeated Filip Horansky 5-7 6-4 6-2 in the Bergamo CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Rune H.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Horansky F.

Horansky F.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Rune H.

Serve advantage — Rune H.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Rune H.Horansky F.
47
Serve
—
58
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Rune H.Horansky F.
1st serve in·Even
62%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
66%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
54%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
59%
Return points won·Even
36%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.8
2.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.2
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 104). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rune H.Horansky F.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
91
29
Break points saved·Dominant
99
34
Break points won·Dominant
84
33
Deciding sets·Dominant
98
54
Tiebreaks·Dominant
99
64

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Rune H.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Horansky F.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.6
Surface form
4.1
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.7
Minutes 14d
9.4
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Rune H.[3]
Ilkel C.
7-57-66
Semi-finals
Rune H.[3]
Molcan A.[1]
7-51-66-4
Ilkel C.
Marozsan F.
7-625-76-4
Quarter-finals
Marozsan F.
Novak D.[2]
7-56-1
Rune H.[3]
Dzumhur D.[8]
7-692-66-1
Molcan A.[1]
Kolar Z.[6]
6-46-4
Ilkel C.
Broady L.[5]
7-53-66-1
R16
Novak D.[2]
Donskoy E.
6-32-66-1
Marozsan F.
Stakhovsky S.
7-56-2
Rune H.[3]
Horansky F.
5-76-46-2
Molcan A.[1]
Fatic N.
6-16-4
Dzumhur D.[8]
Lehecka J.
6-46-4
Broady L.[5]
Marchenko I.
6-44-66-3
Kolar Z.[6]
Oconnell C.
5-77-657-5
Ilkel C.
Albot R.[4]
7-56-3
R32
Novak D.[2]
Marcora R.
7-647-62
Kolar Z.[6]
Kukushkin M.
6-36-1
Broady L.[5]
Petrovic D.
6-33-66-3
Dzumhur D.[8]
Cobolli F.
6-47-5
Donskoy E.
Gaio F.
6-36-3
Albot R.[4]
Janvier M.
5-77-56-4
Oconnell C.
Maden Y.
6-37-65
Ilkel C.
Kotov P.
4-66-17-65
Stakhovsky S.
Arnaldi M.
6-36-747-65
Marozsan F.
Milojevic N.[7]
4-66-16-3
Marchenko I.
Nardi L.
7-616-4
Lehecka J.
Grenier H.
6-37-5
Horansky F.
Potenza L.
6-46-3
Rune H.[3]
Bourgue M.
6-36-4
Fatic N.
Safwat M.
6-46-2
Molcan A.[1]
Serdarusic N.
6-746-46-2