Joao Sousa vs Manuel Guinard — Tenerife CH Round of 16

Tenerife CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
POR8
Joao Sousa
37 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 1 November 2021
hard
FRA
Manuel Guinard
#1565ATP
30 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLLL
Sousa J.
7-5 6-0
Guinard M.
Sousa J.
762
Guinard M.
500

Joao Sousa defeated Manuel Guinard 7-5 6-0 in the Tenerife CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Joao Sousa came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Joao Sousa extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-01-17Australian OpenQ1hardJoao Sousa6-3 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Sousa J.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Guinard M.

Guinard M.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Sousa J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sousa J.Guinard M.
1st serve in·Even
62%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
59%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.3
4.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.0
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (177 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sousa J.Guinard M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
35
13
Break points saved·Slight edge
91
80
Break points won·Slight edge
14
19
Deciding sets·Dominant
48
7
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
23
2

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Sousa J.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Guinard M.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
7.7
Surface form
5.8
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
4.9
Minutes 14d
7.4
7.0
3-set count
7.0
6.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Griekspoor T.[1]
Lopez F.[2]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Griekspoor T.[1]
Verdasco F.[3]
7-656-776-3
Lopez F.[2]
Kuznetsov A.
6-17-63
Quarter-finals
Griekspoor T.[1]
Celikbilek A.[6]
6-37-5
Lopez F.[2]
Peniston R.
6-26-756-1
Kuznetsov A.
Sousa J.[8]
7-666-3
Verdasco F.[3]
Borges N.
6-37-63
R16
Peniston R.
Geerts M.
7-54-67-63
Kuznetsov A.
Halys Q.[4]
6-37-66
Celikbilek A.[6]
Tseng C.
5-76-37-63
Griekspoor T.[1]
Bondarevskiy Y.
6-46-4
Sousa J.[8]
Guinard M.
7-56-0
Borges N.
Ymer E.[7]
7-56-4
Lopez F.[2]
Ferreira Silva F.
7-636-3
Verdasco F.[3]
Giustino L.
6-26-2
R32
Borges N.
Coppejans K.
1-66-26-2
Ferreira Silva F.
Ionel N.
6-16-0
Geerts M.
Gomez E.[5]
7-56-4
Kuznetsov A.
Jianu F.
6-46-2
Guinard M.
Fabbiano T.
6-23-66-4
Ymer E.[7]
Moriya H.
7-646-4
Tseng C.
Clarke J.
6-27-65
Griekspoor T.[1]
Kirkin E.
6-26-2
Celikbilek A.[6]
Skatov T.
6-36-0
Halys Q.[4]
Shevchenko A.
6-746-46-2
Giustino L.
Rincon D.
6-37-5
Bondarevskiy Y.
Polmans M.
5-76-36-0
Peniston R.
De Loore J.
5-76-36-3
Lopez F.[2]
Svrcina D.
6-41-66-4
Sousa J.[8]
Orlov V.
5-76-37-61
Verdasco F.[3]
Moroni G.
6-15-76-2