Jesper De Jong vs Daniel Elahi Galan — Guayaquil CH Quarter-final

Guayaquil CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Jesper De Jong
NED
Jesper De Jong
#73ATP
1711ELO
1696Clay ELO
$612kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLWWWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 1 November 2021
clay
Daniel Elahi Galan
COL3
Daniel Elahi Galan
#304ATP
1531ELO
1492Clay ELO
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWWW
De Jong J.
6-2 6-7 6-3
Galan D.
De Jong J.
66562
Galan D.
27731

Jesper De Jong defeated Daniel Elahi Galan 6-2 6-7 6-3 in the Guayaquil CH quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Jesper De Jong came in ranked #73, defending last year's semi-final.

Key context

  • Match story: Jesper De Jong closed it out in three sets, 6–2 6–7 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
De Jong J.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Galan D.

Galan D.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs De Jong J.

Serve advantage — De Jong J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

De Jong J.Galan D.
49
Serve
—
32
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
De Jong J.Galan D.
1st serve in·Even
59%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
38%
Break points saved·Even
59%
61%
Aces / match·Even
5.7
5.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
De Jong J.Galan D.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
56
48
Break points saved·Even
90
92
Break points won·Clear edge
37
21
Deciding sets·Clear edge
69
55
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
57
66

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
De Jong J.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Galan D.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.8+203 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.2Clay Elo 1492
6.4Overall Elo 1711
ELO gap
3.6Overall Elo 1531
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.8
Surface form
4.5
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
2.9
Minutes 14d
7.1
7.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
De Jong J.Galan D.
Freshness·
92
—

De Jong J.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Tabilo A.
De Jong J.
6-17-5
Semi-finals
Tabilo A.
Seyboth Wild T.[6]
6-27-62
De Jong J.
Etcheverry T.[8]
7-56-3
Quarter-finals
Etcheverry T.[8]
Bagnis F.[2]
6-46-0
Seyboth Wild T.[6]
Kicker N.
6-47-68
Tabilo A.
Oliveira G.
6-46-3
De Jong J.
Galan D.[3]
6-26-756-3
R16
Tabilo A.
King D.
6-36-1
Oliveira G.
Cerundolo F.[5]
6-46-3
Bagnis F.[2]
Alvarez N.
6-24-66-1
Etcheverry T.[8]
Alvarez Varona N.
6-43-67-64
Galan D.[3]
Juarez F.
6-46-3
De Jong J.
Dellien H.[7]
6-16-0
Seyboth Wild T.[6]
Gonzalez A.
7-626-0
Kicker N.
Dutra Da Silva D.
7-656-3
R32
Etcheverry T.[8]
Quiroz R.
6-13-67-5
Alvarez N.
Tirante T.
4-67-56-3
Alvarez Varona N.
Hidalgo D.
2-66-46-3
Galan D.[3]
Mejia N.
6-27-5
Dellien H.[7]
Krstin P.
6-46-2
Gonzalez A.
Galarneau A.
6-26-4
Kicker N.
Baez S.[4]
7-634-67-5
Cerundolo F.[5]
Kopriva V.
5-76-26-3
Oliveira G.
Cid R.
6-37-61
King D.
Guillen Meza A.
0-66-36-4
Tabilo A.
Munar J.[1]
6-46-2
Juarez F.
Diaz Acosta F.
3-66-46-4
Bagnis F.[2]
Casanova H.
6-26-2
Seyboth Wild T.[6]
Collarini A.
6-36-736-2
Dutra Da Silva D.
Hardt N.
2-67-656-0
De Jong J.
Andreozzi G.
3-67-640-0