Alex Molcan vs Nerman Fatic — Bergamo CH Round of 16

Bergamo CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Alex Molcan
SVK1
Alex Molcan
#101ATP
1742ELO
1653Hard ELO
$295kYTD
$2.7MCAREER
28 yrs · 178 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 1 November 2021
hard
BIH
Nerman Fatic
#396ATP
1496ELO
1417Hard ELO
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
Molcan A.
6-1 6-4
Fatic N.
Molcan A.
662
Fatic N.
140

Alex Molcan defeated Nerman Fatic 6-1 6-4 in the Bergamo CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Alex Molcan came in ranked #101, leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's round of 64. Alex Molcan extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-05-24Belgrade 2Q1clayAlex Molcan6-4 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Molcan A.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Fatic N.

Fatic N.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Molcan A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Molcan A.Fatic N.
1st serve in·Even
64%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
61%
Return points won·Even
40%
40%
Break points saved·Even
58%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.9
4.1
Double faults / match·Even
2.4
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Molcan A.Fatic N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
79
24
Break points saved·Dominant
90
63
Break points won·Dominant
61
36
Deciding sets·Dominant
91
24
Tiebreaks·Dominant
91
35

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Molcan A.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Fatic N.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.9+235 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.1Hard Elo 1417
8.0Overall Elo 1742
ELO gap
2.0Overall Elo 1496
5.0
H2H
5.0
3.6
Surface form
2.6
0.0
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Minutes 14d
5.5
7.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Molcan A.Fatic N.
Freshness·
93
—

Molcan A.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Rune H.[3]
Ilkel C.
7-57-66
Semi-finals
Rune H.[3]
Molcan A.[1]
7-51-66-4
Ilkel C.
Marozsan F.
7-625-76-4
Quarter-finals
Marozsan F.
Novak D.[2]
7-56-1
Rune H.[3]
Dzumhur D.[8]
7-692-66-1
Molcan A.[1]
Kolar Z.[6]
6-46-4
Ilkel C.
Broady L.[5]
7-53-66-1
R16
Novak D.[2]
Donskoy E.
6-32-66-1
Marozsan F.
Stakhovsky S.
7-56-2
Rune H.[3]
Horansky F.
5-76-46-2
Molcan A.[1]
Fatic N.
6-16-4
Dzumhur D.[8]
Lehecka J.
6-46-4
Broady L.[5]
Marchenko I.
6-44-66-3
Kolar Z.[6]
Oconnell C.
5-77-657-5
Ilkel C.
Albot R.[4]
7-56-3
R32
Novak D.[2]
Marcora R.
7-647-62
Kolar Z.[6]
Kukushkin M.
6-36-1
Broady L.[5]
Petrovic D.
6-33-66-3
Dzumhur D.[8]
Cobolli F.
6-47-5
Donskoy E.
Gaio F.
6-36-3
Albot R.[4]
Janvier M.
5-77-56-4
Oconnell C.
Maden Y.
6-37-65
Ilkel C.
Kotov P.
4-66-17-65
Stakhovsky S.
Arnaldi M.
6-36-747-65
Marozsan F.
Milojevic N.[7]
4-66-16-3
Marchenko I.
Nardi L.
7-616-4
Lehecka J.
Grenier H.
6-37-5
Horansky F.
Potenza L.
6-46-3
Rune H.[3]
Bourgue M.
6-36-4
Fatic N.
Safwat M.
6-46-2
Molcan A.[1]
Serdarusic N.
6-746-46-2