Jordan Thompson vs Ruben Bemelmans — Eckental CH Round of 16

Eckental CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Jordan Thompson
AUS1
Jordan Thompson
#309ATP
1772ELO
1733Hard ELO
$153kYTD
$9.6MCAREER
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWLW
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 1 November 2021
hard
BEL
Ruben Bemelmans
38 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLL
Thompson J.
6-1 3-1
Bemelmans R.
Thompson J.
63–
Bemelmans R.
11–

Jordan Thompson advanced when Ruben Bemelmans retired 6-1 3-1 in the Eckental CH round of 16. Jordan Thompson extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2017-07-31WashingtonR64hardJordan Thompson6-3 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Thompson J.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Bemelmans R.

Bemelmans R.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Thompson J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Thompson J.Bemelmans R.
1st serve in·Even
60%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
52%
Service points won·Even
66%
65%
Return points won·Even
37%
35%
Break points saved·Even
63%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
7.2
6.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.3
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 53). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Thompson J.Bemelmans R.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
70
16
Break points saved·Slight edge
97
87
Break points won·Clear edge
24
7
Deciding sets·Dominant
91
17
Tiebreaks·Dominant
95
9

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Thompson J.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Bemelmans R.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
2.3
Surface form
5.7
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.9
Minutes 14d
8.0
7.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Masur D.
Cressy M.[6]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Cressy M.[6]
Machac T.[5]
6-33-67-65
Masur D.
Huesler M.
6-26-3
Quarter-finals
Cressy M.[6]
Vesely J.[2]
7-607-63
Huesler M.
Thompson J.[1]
6-36-1
Masur D.
Ramanathan R.
6-36-3
Machac T.[5]
Stricker D.
6-46-4
R16
Thompson J.[1]
Bemelmans R.
6-13-1
Machac T.[5]
Squire H.
6-27-64
Cressy M.[6]
Blancaneaux G.
6-36-4
Vesely J.[2]
Vavassori A.
6-46-1
Ramanathan R.
Marterer M.
7-57-64
Huesler M.
Miedler L.
3-66-26-1
Stricker D.
Copil M.
7-636-2
Masur D.
Basic M.
6-36-4
R32
Vesely J.[2]
Forejtek J.
6-15-77-5
Blancaneaux G.
Furness E.
6-16-1
Copil M.
Sachko V.
2-66-26-4
Squire H.
Erler A.
7-632-67-65
Basic M.
Moeller M.
6-27-5
Masur D.
Otte O.[4]
6-26-736-4
Huesler M.
Heyman C.
6-16-1
Stricker D.
Rodionov J.[3]
5-77-656-4
Bemelmans R.
Simon T.
6-766-37-5
Vavassori A.
Bachinger M.
6-43-66-3
Machac T.[5]
Draper J.
7-654-66-4
Miedler L.
Rehberg M.
6-36-4
Marterer M.
Zuk K.[8]
6-36-4
Thompson J.[1]
Rosenkranz M.
7-56-727-65
Cressy M.[6]
Haerteis J.
6-716-46-3
Ramanathan R.
Setkic A.
7-674-66-3