Facundo Bagnis vs Hernan Casanova — Guayaquil CH Round of 32

Guayaquil CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ARG2
Facundo Bagnis
#431ATP
1591ELO
1584Clay ELO
36 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 1 November 2021
clay
Hernan Casanova
ARG
Hernan Casanova
#337ATP
1393ELO
1381Clay ELO
32 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWLW
Bagnis F.
6-2 6-2
Casanova H.
Bagnis F.
662
Casanova H.
220

Facundo Bagnis defeated Hernan Casanova 6-2 6-2 in the Guayaquil CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Hernan Casanova came in ranked #337, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Bagnis F.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Casanova H.

Casanova H.serving59% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Bagnis F.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bagnis F.Casanova H.
1st serve in·Clear edge
63%
75%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
60%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
63%
57%
Return points won·Even
40%
42%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.5
0.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.7
1.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 194). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bagnis F.Casanova H.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
54
8
Break points saved·Dominant
92
24
Break points won·Clear edge
35
22
Deciding sets·Dominant
89
32
Tiebreaks·Dominant
3
34

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bagnis F.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Casanova H.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.5+203 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.5Clay Elo 1381
7.4Overall Elo 1591
ELO gap
2.6Overall Elo 1393
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.9
Surface form
3.5
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
6.2
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Bagnis F.Casanova H.
Freshness·
—
70

Casanova H.: 4 days rest · 3 matches, 62 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Tabilo A.
De Jong J.
6-17-5
Semi-finals
Tabilo A.
Seyboth Wild T.[6]
6-27-62
De Jong J.
Etcheverry T.[8]
7-56-3
Quarter-finals
Etcheverry T.[8]
Bagnis F.[2]
6-46-0
Seyboth Wild T.[6]
Kicker N.
6-47-68
Tabilo A.
Oliveira G.
6-46-3
De Jong J.
Galan D.[3]
6-26-756-3
R16
Tabilo A.
King D.
6-36-1
Oliveira G.
Cerundolo F.[5]
6-46-3
Bagnis F.[2]
Alvarez N.
6-24-66-1
Etcheverry T.[8]
Alvarez Varona N.
6-43-67-64
Galan D.[3]
Juarez F.
6-46-3
De Jong J.
Dellien H.[7]
6-16-0
Seyboth Wild T.[6]
Gonzalez A.
7-626-0
Kicker N.
Dutra Da Silva D.
7-656-3
R32
Etcheverry T.[8]
Quiroz R.
6-13-67-5
Alvarez N.
Tirante T.
4-67-56-3
Alvarez Varona N.
Hidalgo D.
2-66-46-3
Galan D.[3]
Mejia N.
6-27-5
Dellien H.[7]
Krstin P.
6-46-2
Gonzalez A.
Galarneau A.
6-26-4
Kicker N.
Baez S.[4]
7-634-67-5
Cerundolo F.[5]
Kopriva V.
5-76-26-3
Oliveira G.
Cid R.
6-37-61
King D.
Guillen Meza A.
0-66-36-4
Tabilo A.
Munar J.[1]
6-46-2
Juarez F.
Diaz Acosta F.
3-66-46-4
Bagnis F.[2]
Casanova H.
6-26-2
Seyboth Wild T.[6]
Collarini A.
6-36-736-2
Dutra Da Silva D.
Hardt N.
2-67-656-0
De Jong J.
Andreozzi G.
3-67-640-0