Andrea Vavassori vs Matthias Bachinger — Eckental CH Round of 32

Eckental CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ITA
Andrea Vavassori
#563ATP
1688ELO
1655Hard ELO
31 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 1 November 2021
hard
GER
Matthias Bachinger
39 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLLLLW
Vavassori A.
6-4 3-6 6-3
Bachinger M.
Vavassori A.
6362
Bachinger M.
4631

Andrea Vavassori defeated Matthias Bachinger 6-4 3-6 6-3 in the Eckental CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Matthias Bachinger came in defending last year's round of 16, but Andrea Vavassori had been the form player, winning 6 of their last 7 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Vavassori A.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Bachinger M.

Bachinger M.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Vavassori A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Vavassori A.Bachinger M.
1st serve in·Even
61%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
64%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
64%
63%
Aces / match·Even
5.4
5.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.7
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 67). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Vavassori A.Bachinger M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
57
26
Break points saved·Slight edge
93
85
Break points won·Dominant
33
8
Deciding sets·Dominant
58
11
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
82
75

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Vavassori A.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Bachinger M.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.2
Surface form
6.6
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
5.8
3-set count
4.0
7.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Masur D.
Cressy M.[6]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Cressy M.[6]
Machac T.[5]
6-33-67-65
Masur D.
Huesler M.
6-26-3
Quarter-finals
Cressy M.[6]
Vesely J.[2]
7-607-63
Huesler M.
Thompson J.[1]
6-36-1
Masur D.
Ramanathan R.
6-36-3
Machac T.[5]
Stricker D.
6-46-4
R16
Thompson J.[1]
Bemelmans R.
6-13-1
Machac T.[5]
Squire H.
6-27-64
Cressy M.[6]
Blancaneaux G.
6-36-4
Vesely J.[2]
Vavassori A.
6-46-1
Ramanathan R.
Marterer M.
7-57-64
Huesler M.
Miedler L.
3-66-26-1
Stricker D.
Copil M.
7-636-2
Masur D.
Basic M.
6-36-4
R32
Vesely J.[2]
Forejtek J.
6-15-77-5
Blancaneaux G.
Furness E.
6-16-1
Copil M.
Sachko V.
2-66-26-4
Squire H.
Erler A.
7-632-67-65
Basic M.
Moeller M.
6-27-5
Masur D.
Otte O.[4]
6-26-736-4
Huesler M.
Heyman C.
6-16-1
Stricker D.
Rodionov J.[3]
5-77-656-4
Bemelmans R.
Simon T.
6-766-37-5
Vavassori A.
Bachinger M.
6-43-66-3
Machac T.[5]
Draper J.
7-654-66-4
Miedler L.
Rehberg M.
6-36-4
Marterer M.
Zuk K.[8]
6-36-4
Thompson J.[1]
Rosenkranz M.
7-56-727-65
Cressy M.[6]
Haerteis J.
6-716-46-3
Ramanathan R.
Setkic A.
7-674-66-3