Donna Vekic vs Xin Yu Wang — Courmayeur Quarter-final

Courmayeur · WTA · Quarter-final
Donna Vekic
CRO
Donna Vekic
#35WTA
1807ELO
1736Hard ELO
$625kYTD
$11MCAREER
30 yrs · 179 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 25 October 2021
hard
CHN
Xin Yu Wang
1760ELO
1716Hard ELO
24 yrs · 182 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWLLL
Vekic D.
6-4 6-4
Wang X.
Vekic D.
662
Wang X.
440

Donna Vekic defeated Xin Yu Wang 6-4 6-4 in the Courmayeur quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Donna Vekic came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Donna Vekic extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Donna Vekic edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-02-19DubaiR64hardDonna Vekic6-2 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Vekic D.serving77% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Wang X.

Wang X.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Vekic D.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Vekic D.Wang X.
6
Serve
25
36
Return
40

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Vekic D.Wang X.
1st serve in·Even
57%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
47%
Service points won·Even
59%
58%
Return points won·Even
43%
43%
Break points saved·Even
56%
56%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.0
2.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.0
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Vekic D.Wang X.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
67
60
Break points saved·Even
86
86
Break points won·Clear edge
91
78
Deciding sets·Slight edge
77
86
Tiebreaks·Dominant
33
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Vekic D.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Wang X.
4.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0+20 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
5.0Hard Elo 1716
5.0Overall Elo 1807
ELO gap
5.0Overall Elo 1760
5.0
H2H
5.0
2.8
Surface form
4.2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.6
Minutes 14d
7.8
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Vekic D.Wang X.
Freshness·
97
—

Vekic D.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Vekic D.
Tauson C.[5]
7-636-2
Semi-finals
Vekic D.
Paolini J.[7]
6-26-0
Tauson C.[5]
Samsonova L.[3]
4-67-686-4
Quarter-finals
Paolini J.[7]
Yastremska D.[10]
6-47-64
Vekic D.
Wang X.
6-46-4
Samsonova L.[3]
Kalinskaya A.
6-16-2
Tauson C.[5]
Li A.[9]
3-66-46-2
R16
Kalinskaya A.
Riske Amritraj A.[6]
6-30-66-3
Paolini J.[7]
Stefanini L.
6-47-5
Yastremska D.[10]
Baindl K.
6-13-67-5
Vekic D.
Zheng S.
6-36-4
Wang X.
Zhang S.[8]
7-656-4
Samsonova L.[3]
Bolsova A.
6-36-3
Tauson C.[5]
Gatto Monticone G.
6-46-1
Li A.[9]
Frech M.
5-76-36-1
R32
Wang X.
Bucsa C.
6-15-0
Kalinskaya A.
Trevisan M.
6-26-4
Li A.[9]
Rakhimova K.
4-66-36-4
Yastremska D.[10]
Diatchenko V.
6-36-1
Baindl K.
Bronzetti L.
6-16-3
Paolini J.[7]
Di Giuseppe M.
6-46-1
Vekic D.
Zheng Q.
7-616-2
Bolsova A.
Hsieh S.
6-16-726-4
Gatto Monticone G.
Caregaro M.
6-47-63
Tauson C.[5]
Voegele S.
6-26-2
Stefanini L.
Minella M.
6-33-67-5
Zheng S.
Martic P.[4]
6-36-4
Zhang S.[8]
Pieri J.
6-16-3
Riske Amritraj A.[6]
Raina A.
6-16-1
Samsonova L.[3]
Wagner S.
6-36-0
Frech M.
Radwanska U.
6-26-4