Donna Vekic vs Clara Tauson — Courmayeur Final

Courmayeur · WTA · Final
Donna Vekic
CRO
Donna Vekic
#35WTA
1807ELO
1736Hard ELO
$625kYTD
$11MCAREER
30 yrs · 179 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 25 October 2021
hard
Clara Tauson
DEN5
Clara Tauson
#30WTA
1802ELO
1775Hard ELO
$792kYTD
$5.2MCAREER
23 yrs · 182 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLLL
Vekic D.
7-6 6-2
Tauson C.
Vekic D.
7762
Tauson C.
6320

Donna Vekic defeated Clara Tauson 7-6 6-2 in the Courmayeur final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Clara Tauson came in ranked #30.

Key context

  • Match story: Donna Vekic closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Vekic D.serving77% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Tauson C.

Tauson C.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Vekic D.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Vekic D.Tauson C.
6
Serve
56
36
Return
39

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Vekic D.Tauson C.
1st serve in·Even
57%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
47%
Service points won·Even
59%
60%
Return points won·Even
43%
43%
Break points saved·Even
56%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.0
5.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
5.0
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Vekic D.Tauson C.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
67
73
Break points saved·Slight edge
86
93
Break points won·Even
91
93
Deciding sets·Clear edge
77
57
Tiebreaks·Dominant
33
80

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Vekic D.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Tauson C.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.0Hard Elo 1736
Surface ELO
6.0+40 Hard Elo edge
4.1Overall Elo 1807
ELO gap
5.9Overall Elo 1802
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.8
Surface form
7.7
Fatigue & Travel
7.6
Minutes 14d
6.7
7.0
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Vekic D.Tauson C.
Freshness·Even
97
98

Vekic D.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Tauson C.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Vekic D.
Tauson C.[5]
7-636-2
Semi-finals
Vekic D.
Paolini J.[7]
6-26-0
Tauson C.[5]
Samsonova L.[3]
4-67-686-4
Quarter-finals
Paolini J.[7]
Yastremska D.[10]
6-47-64
Vekic D.
Wang X.
6-46-4
Samsonova L.[3]
Kalinskaya A.
6-16-2
Tauson C.[5]
Li A.[9]
3-66-46-2
R16
Kalinskaya A.
Riske Amritraj A.[6]
6-30-66-3
Paolini J.[7]
Stefanini L.
6-47-5
Yastremska D.[10]
Baindl K.
6-13-67-5
Vekic D.
Zheng S.
6-36-4
Wang X.
Zhang S.[8]
7-656-4
Samsonova L.[3]
Bolsova A.
6-36-3
Tauson C.[5]
Gatto Monticone G.
6-46-1
Li A.[9]
Frech M.
5-76-36-1
R32
Wang X.
Bucsa C.
6-15-0
Kalinskaya A.
Trevisan M.
6-26-4
Li A.[9]
Rakhimova K.
4-66-36-4
Yastremska D.[10]
Diatchenko V.
6-36-1
Baindl K.
Bronzetti L.
6-16-3
Paolini J.[7]
Di Giuseppe M.
6-46-1
Vekic D.
Zheng Q.
7-616-2
Bolsova A.
Hsieh S.
6-16-726-4
Gatto Monticone G.
Caregaro M.
6-47-63
Tauson C.[5]
Voegele S.
6-26-2
Stefanini L.
Minella M.
6-33-67-5
Zheng S.
Martic P.[4]
6-36-4
Zhang S.[8]
Pieri J.
6-16-3
Riske Amritraj A.[6]
Raina A.
6-16-1
Samsonova L.[3]
Wagner S.
6-36-0
Frech M.
Radwanska U.
6-26-4