Mikael Torpegaard vs Tennys Sandgren — Las Vegas CH Round of 32

Las Vegas CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
DEN
Mikael Torpegaard
32 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 25 October 2021
hard
USA3
Tennys Sandgren
34 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
Torpegaard M.
6-7 7-5 3-0
Sandgren T.
Torpegaard M.
6473–
Sandgren T.
7750–

Mikael Torpegaard advanced when Tennys Sandgren retired 6-7 7-5 3-0 in the Las Vegas CH round of 32.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Torpegaard M.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Sandgren T.

Sandgren T.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Torpegaard M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Torpegaard M.Sandgren T.
1st serve in·Even
59%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
49%
Service points won·Even
60%
64%
Return points won·Even
38%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
49%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.4
8.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.4
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (56 vs 151). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Torpegaard M.Sandgren T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
4
36
Break points saved·Dominant
35
92
Break points won·Slight edge
13
2
Deciding sets·Clear edge
16
28
Tiebreaks·Dominant
39
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Torpegaard M.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Sandgren T.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.0
Surface form
4.5
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Wolf J.
Kozlov S.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Kozlov S.
Kovacevic A.
6-26-4
Wolf J.
Mmoh M.
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Wolf J.
Escobedo E.
6-36-3
Kovacevic A.
Daniel T.[5]
6-36-2
Kozlov S.
Gomez E.[7]
7-636-4
Mmoh M.
Torpegaard M.
6-16-756-1
R16
Wolf J.
Kudla D.[2]
4-66-36-0
Escobedo E.
Kwiatkowski T.
7-56-2
Mmoh M.
Vukic A.
6-46-4
Daniel T.[5]
Ito T.
6-26-1
Kovacevic A.
Altmaier D.[4]
7-676-3
Gomez E.[7]
Kubler J.
2-66-07-68
Kozlov S.
Mchugh A.
6-25-77-613
Torpegaard M.
Kelly D.
6-26-3
R32
Escobedo E.
Fratangelo B.
6-767-627-65
Kudla D.[2]
Schnur B.
6-36-2
Wolf J.
Mochizuki S.
6-37-5
Kwiatkowski T.
Jung J.[8]
7-56-2
Kelly D.
Bulus C.
6-36-2
Mmoh M.
Chappell N.
6-26-1
Vukic A.
Krueger M.[6]
6-46-1
Ito T.
Young D.
6-46-4
Kovacevic A.
Eubanks C.
6-13-67-65
Altmaier D.[4]
Uchiyama Y.
7-666-1
Kubler J.
Watanuki Y.
6-756-07-66
Kozlov S.
Mukund S.
6-26-4
Mchugh A.
Johnson S.[1]
6-46-4
Gomez E.[7]
Stebe C.
7-626-0
Daniel T.[5]
Sauer J.
6-06-2
Torpegaard M.
Sandgren T.[3]
6-747-53-0