Michael Mmoh vs Mikael Torpegaard — Las Vegas CH Quarter-final

Las Vegas CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Michael Mmoh
USA
Michael Mmoh
#188ATP
1613ELO
1599Hard ELO
$85kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 25 October 2021
hard
DEN
Mikael Torpegaard
32 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
Mmoh M.
6-1 6-7 6-1
Torpegaard M.
Mmoh M.
66562
Torpegaard M.
17711

Michael Mmoh defeated Mikael Torpegaard 6-1 6-7 6-1 in the Las Vegas CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Michael Mmoh came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 6–7 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mmoh M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Torpegaard M.

Torpegaard M.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Mmoh M.

Serve advantage — Mmoh M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mmoh M.Torpegaard M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
47%
Service points won·Even
63%
60%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Clear edge
62%
49%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.0
4.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.8
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 56). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mmoh M.Torpegaard M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
66
4
Break points saved·Dominant
91
35
Break points won·Clear edge
31
13
Deciding sets·Dominant
90
16
Tiebreaks·Dominant
77
39

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mmoh M.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Torpegaard M.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
4.6No prior meetings
H2H
5.4
4.0
Surface form
3.0
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mmoh M.Torpegaard M.
Freshness·
95
—

Mmoh M.: 13 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Wolf J.
Kozlov S.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Kozlov S.
Kovacevic A.
6-26-4
Wolf J.
Mmoh M.
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Wolf J.
Escobedo E.
6-36-3
Kovacevic A.
Daniel T.[5]
6-36-2
Kozlov S.
Gomez E.[7]
7-636-4
Mmoh M.
Torpegaard M.
6-16-756-1
R16
Wolf J.
Kudla D.[2]
4-66-36-0
Escobedo E.
Kwiatkowski T.
7-56-2
Mmoh M.
Vukic A.
6-46-4
Daniel T.[5]
Ito T.
6-26-1
Kovacevic A.
Altmaier D.[4]
7-676-3
Gomez E.[7]
Kubler J.
2-66-07-68
Kozlov S.
Mchugh A.
6-25-77-613
Torpegaard M.
Kelly D.
6-26-3
R32
Escobedo E.
Fratangelo B.
6-767-627-65
Kudla D.[2]
Schnur B.
6-36-2
Wolf J.
Mochizuki S.
6-37-5
Kwiatkowski T.
Jung J.[8]
7-56-2
Kelly D.
Bulus C.
6-36-2
Mmoh M.
Chappell N.
6-26-1
Vukic A.
Krueger M.[6]
6-46-1
Ito T.
Young D.
6-46-4
Kovacevic A.
Eubanks C.
6-13-67-65
Altmaier D.[4]
Uchiyama Y.
7-666-1
Kubler J.
Watanuki Y.
6-756-07-66
Kozlov S.
Mukund S.
6-26-4
Mchugh A.
Johnson S.[1]
6-46-4
Gomez E.[7]
Stebe C.
7-626-0
Daniel T.[5]
Sauer J.
6-06-2
Torpegaard M.
Sandgren T.[3]
6-747-53-0