Saisai Zheng vs Petra Martic — Courmayeur Round of 32

Courmayeur · WTA · Round of 32
CHN
Saisai Zheng
#1500WTA
32 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 25 October 2021
hard
CRO4
Petra Martic
#1014WTA
1673ELO
1633Hard ELO
35 yrs · 181 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLWLL
Zheng S.
6-3 6-4
Martic P.
Zheng S.
662
Martic P.
340

Saisai Zheng defeated Petra Martic 6-3 6-4 in the Courmayeur round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Petra Martic came in ranked #1014, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Saisai Zheng claimed a first win over Petra Martic in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Saisai Zheng closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2019-10-22ZhuhaiRRhardPetra Martic6-4 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Zheng S.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Martic P.

Martic P.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Zheng S.

Serve advantage — Martic P.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Zheng S.Martic P.
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
60%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
56%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
53%
59%
Return points won·Even
42%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
51%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
0.9
4.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.6
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (45 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Zheng S.Martic P.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
19
74
Break points saved·Dominant
16
85
Break points won·Slight edge
71
66
Deciding sets·Dominant
50
88
Tiebreaks·Dominant
40
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Zheng S.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Martic P.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
0.0
H2H
10.0
5.1
Surface form
2.3
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.5
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Vekic D.
Tauson C.[5]
7-636-2
Semi-finals
Vekic D.
Paolini J.[7]
6-26-0
Tauson C.[5]
Samsonova L.[3]
4-67-686-4
Quarter-finals
Paolini J.[7]
Yastremska D.[10]
6-47-64
Vekic D.
Wang X.
6-46-4
Samsonova L.[3]
Kalinskaya A.
6-16-2
Tauson C.[5]
Li A.[9]
3-66-46-2
R16
Kalinskaya A.
Riske Amritraj A.[6]
6-30-66-3
Paolini J.[7]
Stefanini L.
6-47-5
Yastremska D.[10]
Baindl K.
6-13-67-5
Vekic D.
Zheng S.
6-36-4
Wang X.
Zhang S.[8]
7-656-4
Samsonova L.[3]
Bolsova A.
6-36-3
Tauson C.[5]
Gatto Monticone G.
6-46-1
Li A.[9]
Frech M.
5-76-36-1
R32
Wang X.
Bucsa C.
6-15-0
Kalinskaya A.
Trevisan M.
6-26-4
Li A.[9]
Rakhimova K.
4-66-36-4
Yastremska D.[10]
Diatchenko V.
6-36-1
Baindl K.
Bronzetti L.
6-16-3
Paolini J.[7]
Di Giuseppe M.
6-46-1
Vekic D.
Zheng Q.
7-616-2
Bolsova A.
Hsieh S.
6-16-726-4
Gatto Monticone G.
Caregaro M.
6-47-63
Tauson C.[5]
Voegele S.
6-26-2
Stefanini L.
Minella M.
6-33-67-5
Zheng S.
Martic P.[4]
6-36-4
Zhang S.[8]
Pieri J.
6-16-3
Riske Amritraj A.[6]
Raina A.
6-16-1
Samsonova L.[3]
Wagner S.
6-36-0
Frech M.
Radwanska U.
6-26-4