Oscar Otte vs Maximilian Marterer — Ismaning CH Quarter-final

Ismaning CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
GER5
Oscar Otte
#1056ATP
32 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 25 October 2021
hard
GER
Maximilian Marterer
31 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWWWW
Otte O.
3-6 6-3 7-6
Marterer M.
Otte O.
36772
Marterer M.
63651

Oscar Otte defeated Maximilian Marterer 3-6 6-3 7-6 in the Ismaning CH quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Maximilian Marterer came in defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Otte O.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Marterer M.

Marterer M.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Otte O.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Otte O.Marterer M.
1st serve in·Even
57%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
78%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
53%
Service points won·Even
65%
65%
Return points won·Even
37%
35%
Break points saved·Even
63%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
9.0
5.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.0
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (163 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Otte O.Marterer M.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
41
47
Break points saved·Even
93
93
Break points won·Clear edge
30
13
Deciding sets·Dominant
20
69
Tiebreaks·Dominant
80
40

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Otte O.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Marterer M.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.2
Surface form
3.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
6.6
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
7.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Otte O.[5]
Lacko L.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Otte O.[5]
Cressy M.[7]
7-52-67-65
Lacko L.
Halys Q.[8]
6-17-65
Quarter-finals
Otte O.[5]
Marterer M.
3-66-37-65
Cressy M.[7]
Zuk K.
6-776-47-64
Halys Q.[8]
Forejtek J.
3-66-26-2
Lacko L.
Bachinger M.
7-53-66-4
R16
Marterer M.
Rosenkranz M.
6-37-63
Otte O.[5]
Lenz J.
6-36-4
Zuk K.
Seppi A.[3]
4-66-47-64
Lacko L.
Machac T.[6]
6-726-47-62
Bachinger M.
Van Rijthoven T.
6-746-46-2
Forejtek J.
Maden Y.
7-633-66-1
Halys Q.[8]
Bemelmans R.
7-686-756-4
Cressy M.[7]
Virtanen O.
7-653-67-5
R32
Marterer M.
Vesely J.[2]
7-686-4
Rosenkranz M.
Huesler M.
6-726-27-60
Lenz J.
Ilkel C.
6-757-56-1
Seppi A.[3]
Kamke T.
7-56-3
Zuk K.
Sachko V.
6-26-4
Virtanen O.
Rehberg M.
7-56-2
Cressy M.[7]
Moriya H.
6-37-5
Machac T.[6]
Coppejans K.
6-46-2
Bachinger M.
Celikbilek A.
6-36-1
Van Rijthoven T.
Hanfmann Y.[4]
5-77-646-4
Bemelmans R.
Squire H.
6-36-4
Forejtek J.
Thompson J.[1]
5-76-26-2
Halys Q.[8]
Masur D.
6-45-76-3
Otte O.[5]
Haase R.
6-746-46-4
Lacko L.
Copil M.
7-687-64
Maden Y.
Moraing M.
W/O