Yannick Maden vs Mats Moraing — Ismaning CH Round of 32

Ismaning CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GER
Yannick Maden
36 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLLLL
—
Sets
Walkover
Monday, 25 October 2021
hard
GER
Mats Moraing
34 yrs · 198 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLWLW
Maden Y.
vs
Moraing M.

Yannick Maden advanced past Mats Moraing via walkover in the Ismaning CH round of 32. Yannick Maden claimed a first win over Mats Moraing in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-03-07Indian Wells MastersQ1hardMats Moraing5-4 RET

Serve vs return

This season
Maden Y.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Moraing M.

Moraing M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Maden Y.

Serve advantage — Moraing M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Maden Y.Moraing M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
56%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
62%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
57%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.8
8.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.4
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (35 vs 118). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Maden Y.Moraing M.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
30
40
Break points saved·Clear edge
70
86
Break points won·Clear edge
39
18
Deciding sets·Dominant
20
66
Tiebreaks·Dominant
54
18

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Maden Y.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Moraing M.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
2.7
Surface form
6.0
0.0Lost last 9
Win streak
0.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Otte O.[5]
Lacko L.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Otte O.[5]
Cressy M.[7]
7-52-67-65
Lacko L.
Halys Q.[8]
6-17-65
Quarter-finals
Otte O.[5]
Marterer M.
3-66-37-65
Cressy M.[7]
Zuk K.
6-776-47-64
Halys Q.[8]
Forejtek J.
3-66-26-2
Lacko L.
Bachinger M.
7-53-66-4
R16
Marterer M.
Rosenkranz M.
6-37-63
Otte O.[5]
Lenz J.
6-36-4
Zuk K.
Seppi A.[3]
4-66-47-64
Lacko L.
Machac T.[6]
6-726-47-62
Bachinger M.
Van Rijthoven T.
6-746-46-2
Forejtek J.
Maden Y.
7-633-66-1
Halys Q.[8]
Bemelmans R.
7-686-756-4
Cressy M.[7]
Virtanen O.
7-653-67-5
R32
Marterer M.
Vesely J.[2]
7-686-4
Rosenkranz M.
Huesler M.
6-726-27-60
Lenz J.
Ilkel C.
6-757-56-1
Seppi A.[3]
Kamke T.
7-56-3
Zuk K.
Sachko V.
6-26-4
Virtanen O.
Rehberg M.
7-56-2
Cressy M.[7]
Moriya H.
6-37-5
Machac T.[6]
Coppejans K.
6-46-2
Bachinger M.
Celikbilek A.
6-36-1
Van Rijthoven T.
Hanfmann Y.[4]
5-77-646-4
Bemelmans R.
Squire H.
6-36-4
Forejtek J.
Thompson J.[1]
5-76-26-2
Halys Q.[8]
Masur D.
6-45-76-3
Otte O.[5]
Haase R.
6-746-46-4
Lacko L.
Copil M.
7-687-64
Maden Y.
Moraing M.
W/O