Clara Tauson vs Ann Li — Courmayeur Quarter-final

Courmayeur · WTA · Quarter-final
Clara Tauson
DEN5
Clara Tauson
#30WTA
1802ELO
1775Hard ELO
$792kYTD
$5.2MCAREER
23 yrs · 182 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 25 October 2021
hard
Ann Li
USA9
Ann Li
#31WTA
1807ELO
1746Hard ELO
$718kYTD
$3.8MCAREER
26 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWLWW
Tauson C.
3-6 6-4 6-2
Li A.
Tauson C.
3662
Li A.
6421

Clara Tauson defeated Ann Li 3-6 6-4 6-2 in the Courmayeur quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Clara Tauson came in ranked #30.

Key context

  • Match story: Clara Tauson dropped the opening set before beating Ann Li 3–6 6–4 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tauson C.serving77% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Li A.

Li A.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Tauson C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Tauson C.Li A.
56
Serve
47
39
Return
49

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Tauson C.Li A.
1st serve in·Even
59%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
47%
Service points won·Even
60%
58%
Return points won·Even
43%
44%
Break points saved·Even
57%
55%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.1
3.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.6
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tauson C.Li A.
Clutch Rating·Even
73
76
Break points saved·Slight edge
93
83
Break points won·Slight edge
93
87
Deciding sets·Dominant
57
87
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
80
66

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tauson C.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Li A.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.7+30 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.3Hard Elo 1746
5.5Overall Elo 1802
ELO gap
4.5Overall Elo 1807
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.7
Surface form
7.7
Win streak
9.05-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.7
Minutes 14d
5.0
4.0
3-set count
7.0
6.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tauson C.Li A.
Freshness·Even
98
97

Tauson C.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Li A.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Vekic D.
Tauson C.[5]
7-636-2
Semi-finals
Vekic D.
Paolini J.[7]
6-26-0
Tauson C.[5]
Samsonova L.[3]
4-67-686-4
Quarter-finals
Paolini J.[7]
Yastremska D.[10]
6-47-64
Vekic D.
Wang X.
6-46-4
Samsonova L.[3]
Kalinskaya A.
6-16-2
Tauson C.[5]
Li A.[9]
3-66-46-2
R16
Kalinskaya A.
Riske Amritraj A.[6]
6-30-66-3
Paolini J.[7]
Stefanini L.
6-47-5
Yastremska D.[10]
Baindl K.
6-13-67-5
Vekic D.
Zheng S.
6-36-4
Wang X.
Zhang S.[8]
7-656-4
Samsonova L.[3]
Bolsova A.
6-36-3
Tauson C.[5]
Gatto Monticone G.
6-46-1
Li A.[9]
Frech M.
5-76-36-1
R32
Wang X.
Bucsa C.
6-15-0
Kalinskaya A.
Trevisan M.
6-26-4
Li A.[9]
Rakhimova K.
4-66-36-4
Yastremska D.[10]
Diatchenko V.
6-36-1
Baindl K.
Bronzetti L.
6-16-3
Paolini J.[7]
Di Giuseppe M.
6-46-1
Vekic D.
Zheng Q.
7-616-2
Bolsova A.
Hsieh S.
6-16-726-4
Gatto Monticone G.
Caregaro M.
6-47-63
Tauson C.[5]
Voegele S.
6-26-2
Stefanini L.
Minella M.
6-33-67-5
Zheng S.
Martic P.[4]
6-36-4
Zhang S.[8]
Pieri J.
6-16-3
Riske Amritraj A.[6]
Raina A.
6-16-1
Samsonova L.[3]
Wagner S.
6-36-0
Frech M.
Radwanska U.
6-26-4