Oscar Otte vs Julian Lenz — Ismaning CH Round of 16

Ismaning CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
GER5
Oscar Otte
#1056ATP
32 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 25 October 2021
hard
GER
Julian Lenz
33 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWWWLLW
Otte O.
6-3 6-4
Lenz J.
Otte O.
662
Lenz J.
340

Oscar Otte defeated Julian Lenz 6-3 6-4 in the Ismaning CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Julian Lenz came in defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

  • Match story: Oscar Otte closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Otte O.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Lenz J.

Lenz J.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Otte O.

Serve advantage — Otte O.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Otte O.Lenz J.
1st serve in·Even
57%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
77%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
59%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
55%
Aces / match·Dominant
9.0
4.6
Double faults / match·Even
4.1
4.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (163 vs 78). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Otte O.Lenz J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
41
12
Break points saved·Dominant
93
40
Break points won·Clear edge
30
13
Deciding sets·Clear edge
20
39
Tiebreaks·Dominant
80
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Otte O.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Lenz J.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.2
Surface form
2.2
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.6
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Otte O.[5]
Lacko L.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Otte O.[5]
Cressy M.[7]
7-52-67-65
Lacko L.
Halys Q.[8]
6-17-65
Quarter-finals
Otte O.[5]
Marterer M.
3-66-37-65
Cressy M.[7]
Zuk K.
6-776-47-64
Halys Q.[8]
Forejtek J.
3-66-26-2
Lacko L.
Bachinger M.
7-53-66-4
R16
Marterer M.
Rosenkranz M.
6-37-63
Otte O.[5]
Lenz J.
6-36-4
Zuk K.
Seppi A.[3]
4-66-47-64
Lacko L.
Machac T.[6]
6-726-47-62
Bachinger M.
Van Rijthoven T.
6-746-46-2
Forejtek J.
Maden Y.
7-633-66-1
Halys Q.[8]
Bemelmans R.
7-686-756-4
Cressy M.[7]
Virtanen O.
7-653-67-5
R32
Marterer M.
Vesely J.[2]
7-686-4
Rosenkranz M.
Huesler M.
6-726-27-60
Lenz J.
Ilkel C.
6-757-56-1
Seppi A.[3]
Kamke T.
7-56-3
Zuk K.
Sachko V.
6-26-4
Virtanen O.
Rehberg M.
7-56-2
Cressy M.[7]
Moriya H.
6-37-5
Machac T.[6]
Coppejans K.
6-46-2
Bachinger M.
Celikbilek A.
6-36-1
Van Rijthoven T.
Hanfmann Y.[4]
5-77-646-4
Bemelmans R.
Squire H.
6-36-4
Forejtek J.
Thompson J.[1]
5-76-26-2
Halys Q.[8]
Masur D.
6-45-76-3
Otte O.[5]
Haase R.
6-746-46-4
Lacko L.
Copil M.
7-687-64
Maden Y.
Moraing M.
W/O