Denis Kudla vs Brayden Schnur — Las Vegas CH Round of 32

Las Vegas CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA2
Denis Kudla
33 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 25 October 2021
hard
CAN
Brayden Schnur
31 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLLLLLW
Kudla D.
6-3 6-2
Schnur B.
Kudla D.
662
Schnur B.
320

Denis Kudla defeated Brayden Schnur 6-3 6-2 in the Las Vegas CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Denis Kudla came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Denis Kudla extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-02-26AcapulcoQ1hardDenis Kudla6-3 3-6 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Kudla D.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Schnur B.

Schnur B.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Kudla D.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kudla D.Schnur B.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.6
6.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 74). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kudla D.Schnur B.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
50
27
Break points saved·Even
90
86
Break points won·Clear edge
19
4
Deciding sets·Dominant
81
14
Tiebreaks·Dominant
30
77

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kudla D.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Schnur B.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.5
Surface form
5.3
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Wolf J.
Kozlov S.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Kozlov S.
Kovacevic A.
6-26-4
Wolf J.
Mmoh M.
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Wolf J.
Escobedo E.
6-36-3
Kovacevic A.
Daniel T.[5]
6-36-2
Kozlov S.
Gomez E.[7]
7-636-4
Mmoh M.
Torpegaard M.
6-16-756-1
R16
Wolf J.
Kudla D.[2]
4-66-36-0
Escobedo E.
Kwiatkowski T.
7-56-2
Mmoh M.
Vukic A.
6-46-4
Daniel T.[5]
Ito T.
6-26-1
Kovacevic A.
Altmaier D.[4]
7-676-3
Gomez E.[7]
Kubler J.
2-66-07-68
Kozlov S.
Mchugh A.
6-25-77-613
Torpegaard M.
Kelly D.
6-26-3
R32
Escobedo E.
Fratangelo B.
6-767-627-65
Kudla D.[2]
Schnur B.
6-36-2
Wolf J.
Mochizuki S.
6-37-5
Kwiatkowski T.
Jung J.[8]
7-56-2
Kelly D.
Bulus C.
6-36-2
Mmoh M.
Chappell N.
6-26-1
Vukic A.
Krueger M.[6]
6-46-1
Ito T.
Young D.
6-46-4
Kovacevic A.
Eubanks C.
6-13-67-65
Altmaier D.[4]
Uchiyama Y.
7-666-1
Kubler J.
Watanuki Y.
6-756-07-66
Kozlov S.
Mukund S.
6-26-4
Mchugh A.
Johnson S.[1]
6-46-4
Gomez E.[7]
Stebe C.
7-626-0
Daniel T.[5]
Sauer J.
6-06-2
Torpegaard M.
Sandgren T.[3]
6-747-53-0