Anett Kontaveit vs Aleksandra Krunic — Cluj-Napoca 2 Round of 32

Cluj-Napoca 2 · WTA · Round of 32
EST2
Anett Kontaveit
30 yrs · 174 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 25 October 2021
hard
SRB
Aleksandra Krunic
#936WTA
33 yrs · 163 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLLLW
Kontaveit A.
6-3 7-5
Krunic A.
Kontaveit A.
672
Krunic A.
350

Anett Kontaveit defeated Aleksandra Krunic 6-3 7-5 in the Cluj-Napoca 2 round of 32 on hard. Anett Kontaveit extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-01-15Australian OpenR128hardAnett Kontaveit6-4 7-5
2015-09-28TashkentR32hardAleksandra Krunic6-2 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Kontaveit A.serving77% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Krunic A.

Krunic A.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Kontaveit A.

Serve advantage — Kontaveit A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kontaveit A.Krunic A.
1st serve in·Even
62%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
61%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
49%
Service points won·Even
60%
56%
Return points won·Even
44%
44%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
52%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.3
2.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.8
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (117 vs 131). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kontaveit A.Krunic A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
82
29
Break points saved·Dominant
85
20
Break points won·Clear edge
91
75
Deciding sets·Slight edge
90
79
Tiebreaks·Dominant
77
18

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kontaveit A.
7.2
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Krunic A.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
8.7
Surface form
4.8
9.05-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.9
Minutes 14d
9.0
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Kontaveit A.[2]
Halep S.[1]
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Halep S.[1]
Kostyuk M.[6]
6-06-1
Kontaveit A.[2]
Peterson R.
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Peterson R.
Tsurenko L.
6-23-66-3
Kostyuk M.[6]
Raducanu E.[3]
6-26-1
Halep S.[1]
Cristian J.
6-16-1
Kontaveit A.[2]
Kalinina A.[8]
6-36-1
R16
Raducanu E.[3]
Bogdan A.
6-36-4
Halep S.[1]
Gracheva V.
6-46-2
Cristian J.
Tomljanovic A.[5]
7-657-5
Kostyuk M.[6]
Barthel M.
6-46-4
Peterson R.
Bara I.
6-06-3
Tsurenko L.
Gasanova A.
6-27-5
Kalinina A.[8]
Friedsam A.
6-26-2
Kontaveit A.[2]
Van Uytvanck A.
6-36-4
R32
Halep S.[1]
Ruse E.
6-16-2
Raducanu E.[3]
Hercog P.
4-67-56-1
Van Uytvanck A.
Kovinic D.
6-46-4
Bogdan A.
Jorovic I.
7-616-4
Gasanova A.
Teichmann J.[4]
4-66-07-5
Bara I.
Begu I.[7]
7-620-66-4
Cristian J.
Juvan K.
3-67-687-63
Tomljanovic A.[5]
Potapova A.
6-25-77-5
Gracheva V.
Petkovic A.
6-42-66-4
Barthel M.
Bondar A.
6-37-5
Kostyuk M.[6]
Pera B.
6-36-4
Peterson R.
Fett J.
6-16-3
Tsurenko L.
Prisacariu A.
7-56-2
Kalinina A.[8]
Pattinama Kerkhove L.
6-16-1
Friedsam A.
Cadantu Ignatik A.
5-76-46-4
Kontaveit A.[2]
Krunic A.
6-37-5