Andreas Seppi vs Tobias Kamke — Ismaning CH Round of 32

Ismaning CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ITA3
Andreas Seppi
42 yrs · 190 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 25 October 2021
hard
GER
Tobias Kamke
40 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWLWL
Seppi A.
7-5 6-3
Kamke T.
Seppi A.
762
Kamke T.
530

Andreas Seppi defeated Tobias Kamke 7-5 6-3 in the Ismaning CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Andreas Seppi came in leading the head-to-head 2–1. Andreas Seppi extended the head-to-head to 3–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Andreas Seppi closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–3.

Head to head

2–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2011-06-12EastbourneR32grassAndreas Seppi3-6 6-1 6-4
2010-06-21WimbledonR64grassTobias Kamke3-6 6-2 6-3 6-4
2008-06-23WimbledonR128grassAndreas Seppi5-7 6-3 6-2 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Seppi A.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Kamke T.

Kamke T.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Seppi A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Seppi A.Kamke T.
1st serve in·Even
57%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
60%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.2
1.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.6
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (85 vs 60). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Seppi A.Kamke T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
53
14
Break points saved·Dominant
94
69
Break points won·Clear edge
45
22
Deciding sets·Dominant
63
17
Tiebreaks·Dominant
32
7

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Seppi A.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Kamke T.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.2
Surface form
5.7
Fatigue & Travel
7.4
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
7.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Otte O.[5]
Lacko L.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Otte O.[5]
Cressy M.[7]
7-52-67-65
Lacko L.
Halys Q.[8]
6-17-65
Quarter-finals
Otte O.[5]
Marterer M.
3-66-37-65
Cressy M.[7]
Zuk K.
6-776-47-64
Halys Q.[8]
Forejtek J.
3-66-26-2
Lacko L.
Bachinger M.
7-53-66-4
R16
Marterer M.
Rosenkranz M.
6-37-63
Otte O.[5]
Lenz J.
6-36-4
Zuk K.
Seppi A.[3]
4-66-47-64
Lacko L.
Machac T.[6]
6-726-47-62
Bachinger M.
Van Rijthoven T.
6-746-46-2
Forejtek J.
Maden Y.
7-633-66-1
Halys Q.[8]
Bemelmans R.
7-686-756-4
Cressy M.[7]
Virtanen O.
7-653-67-5
R32
Marterer M.
Vesely J.[2]
7-686-4
Rosenkranz M.
Huesler M.
6-726-27-60
Lenz J.
Ilkel C.
6-757-56-1
Seppi A.[3]
Kamke T.
7-56-3
Zuk K.
Sachko V.
6-26-4
Virtanen O.
Rehberg M.
7-56-2
Cressy M.[7]
Moriya H.
6-37-5
Machac T.[6]
Coppejans K.
6-46-2
Bachinger M.
Celikbilek A.
6-36-1
Van Rijthoven T.
Hanfmann Y.[4]
5-77-646-4
Bemelmans R.
Squire H.
6-36-4
Forejtek J.
Thompson J.[1]
5-76-26-2
Halys Q.[8]
Masur D.
6-45-76-3
Otte O.[5]
Haase R.
6-746-46-4
Lacko L.
Copil M.
7-687-64
Maden Y.
Moraing M.
W/O