Julian Lenz vs Cem Ilkel — Ismaning CH Round of 32

Ismaning CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GER
Julian Lenz
33 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWWWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 25 October 2021
hard
Cem Ilkel
TUR
Cem Ilkel
#1462ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
Lenz J.
6-7 7-5 6-1
Ilkel C.
Lenz J.
65762
Ilkel C.
77511

Julian Lenz defeated Cem Ilkel 6-7 7-5 6-1 in the Ismaning CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Julian Lenz came in defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Lenz J.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Ilkel C.

Ilkel C.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Lenz J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Lenz J.Ilkel C.
1st serve in·Even
61%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
50%
Service points won·Even
59%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
55%
58%
Aces / match·Even
4.4
4.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.1
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (78 vs 191). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Lenz J.Ilkel C.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
12
32
Break points saved·Slight edge
40
49
Break points won·Slight edge
13
3
Deciding sets·Dominant
39
70
Tiebreaks·Dominant
23
66

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Lenz J.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Ilkel C.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.2
Surface form
5.7
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Prev. match
6.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Otte O.[5]
Lacko L.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Otte O.[5]
Cressy M.[7]
7-52-67-65
Lacko L.
Halys Q.[8]
6-17-65
Quarter-finals
Otte O.[5]
Marterer M.
3-66-37-65
Cressy M.[7]
Zuk K.
6-776-47-64
Halys Q.[8]
Forejtek J.
3-66-26-2
Lacko L.
Bachinger M.
7-53-66-4
R16
Marterer M.
Rosenkranz M.
6-37-63
Otte O.[5]
Lenz J.
6-36-4
Zuk K.
Seppi A.[3]
4-66-47-64
Lacko L.
Machac T.[6]
6-726-47-62
Bachinger M.
Van Rijthoven T.
6-746-46-2
Forejtek J.
Maden Y.
7-633-66-1
Halys Q.[8]
Bemelmans R.
7-686-756-4
Cressy M.[7]
Virtanen O.
7-653-67-5
R32
Marterer M.
Vesely J.[2]
7-686-4
Rosenkranz M.
Huesler M.
6-726-27-60
Lenz J.
Ilkel C.
6-757-56-1
Seppi A.[3]
Kamke T.
7-56-3
Zuk K.
Sachko V.
6-26-4
Virtanen O.
Rehberg M.
7-56-2
Cressy M.[7]
Moriya H.
6-37-5
Machac T.[6]
Coppejans K.
6-46-2
Bachinger M.
Celikbilek A.
6-36-1
Van Rijthoven T.
Hanfmann Y.[4]
5-77-646-4
Bemelmans R.
Squire H.
6-36-4
Forejtek J.
Thompson J.[1]
5-76-26-2
Halys Q.[8]
Masur D.
6-45-76-3
Otte O.[5]
Haase R.
6-746-46-4
Lacko L.
Copil M.
7-687-64
Maden Y.
Moraing M.
W/O