Mats Rosenkranz vs Marc Andrea Huesler — Ismaning CH Round of 32

Ismaning CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GER
Mats Rosenkranz
#358ATP
1454ELO
1424Hard ELO
27 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 25 October 2021
hard
Marc Andrea Huesler
SUI
Marc Andrea Huesler
#307ATP
1504ELO
1489Hard ELO
30 yrs · 196 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWLLWW
Rosenkranz M.
6-7 6-2 7-6
Huesler M.
Rosenkranz M.
626772
Huesler M.
772601

Mats Rosenkranz defeated Marc Andrea Huesler 6-7 6-2 7-6 in the Ismaning CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Marc Andrea Huesler came in ranked #307, defending the title.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Rosenkranz M.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Huesler M.

Huesler M.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Rosenkranz M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Rosenkranz M.Huesler M.
1st serve in·Even
60%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
76%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
53%
Service points won·Even
65%
66%
Return points won·Even
35%
35%
Break points saved·Even
65%
65%
Aces / match·Slight edge
8.7
8.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.5
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (181 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rosenkranz M.Huesler M.
Clutch Rating·Even
31
29
Break points saved·Slight edge
86
95
Break points won·Slight edge
1
7
Deciding sets·Dominant
64
13
Tiebreaks·Dominant
6
67

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Rosenkranz M.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Huesler M.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.1Hard Elo 1424
Surface ELO
5.9+65 Hard Elo edge
4.2Overall Elo 1454
ELO gap
5.8Overall Elo 1504
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.0
Surface form
6.1
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Rosenkranz M.Huesler M.
Freshness·
—
79

Huesler M.: 2 days rest · 2 matches, 42 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Otte O.[5]
Lacko L.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Otte O.[5]
Cressy M.[7]
7-52-67-65
Lacko L.
Halys Q.[8]
6-17-65
Quarter-finals
Otte O.[5]
Marterer M.
3-66-37-65
Cressy M.[7]
Zuk K.
6-776-47-64
Halys Q.[8]
Forejtek J.
3-66-26-2
Lacko L.
Bachinger M.
7-53-66-4
R16
Marterer M.
Rosenkranz M.
6-37-63
Otte O.[5]
Lenz J.
6-36-4
Zuk K.
Seppi A.[3]
4-66-47-64
Lacko L.
Machac T.[6]
6-726-47-62
Bachinger M.
Van Rijthoven T.
6-746-46-2
Forejtek J.
Maden Y.
7-633-66-1
Halys Q.[8]
Bemelmans R.
7-686-756-4
Cressy M.[7]
Virtanen O.
7-653-67-5
R32
Marterer M.
Vesely J.[2]
7-686-4
Rosenkranz M.
Huesler M.
6-726-27-60
Lenz J.
Ilkel C.
6-757-56-1
Seppi A.[3]
Kamke T.
7-56-3
Zuk K.
Sachko V.
6-26-4
Virtanen O.
Rehberg M.
7-56-2
Cressy M.[7]
Moriya H.
6-37-5
Machac T.[6]
Coppejans K.
6-46-2
Bachinger M.
Celikbilek A.
6-36-1
Van Rijthoven T.
Hanfmann Y.[4]
5-77-646-4
Bemelmans R.
Squire H.
6-36-4
Forejtek J.
Thompson J.[1]
5-76-26-2
Halys Q.[8]
Masur D.
6-45-76-3
Otte O.[5]
Haase R.
6-746-46-4
Lacko L.
Copil M.
7-687-64
Maden Y.
Moraing M.
W/O