Quentin Halys vs Daniel Masur — Ismaning CH Round of 32

Ismaning CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Quentin Halys
FRA8
Quentin Halys
#90ATP
1707ELO
1677Hard ELO
$694kYTD
$5.4MCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 25 October 2021
hard
Daniel Masur
GER
Daniel Masur
#386ATP
1413ELO
1383Hard ELO
31 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLWW
Halys Q.
6-4 5-7 6-3
Masur D.
Halys Q.
6562
Masur D.
4731

Quentin Halys defeated Daniel Masur 6-4 5-7 6-3 in the Ismaning CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Quentin Halys came in ranked #90, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

  • Match story: Quentin Halys closed it out in three sets, 6–4 5–7 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Halys Q.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Masur D.

Masur D.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Halys Q.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Halys Q.Masur D.
39
Serve
—
26
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Halys Q.Masur D.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
79%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
67%
63%
Return points won·Even
34%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
11.1
5.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.9
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Halys Q.Masur D.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
57
10
Break points saved·Clear edge
97
73
Break points won·Even
4
5
Deciding sets·Dominant
75
15
Tiebreaks·Dominant
91
13

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Halys Q.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Masur D.
4.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
8.6+294 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.4Hard Elo 1383
8.4Overall Elo 1707
ELO gap
1.6Overall Elo 1413
4.6No prior meetings
H2H
5.4
4.4
Surface form
4.9
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
8.1
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
4.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Halys Q.Masur D.
Freshness·Slight edge
93
100

Halys Q.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Masur D.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Otte O.[5]
Lacko L.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Otte O.[5]
Cressy M.[7]
7-52-67-65
Lacko L.
Halys Q.[8]
6-17-65
Quarter-finals
Otte O.[5]
Marterer M.
3-66-37-65
Cressy M.[7]
Zuk K.
6-776-47-64
Halys Q.[8]
Forejtek J.
3-66-26-2
Lacko L.
Bachinger M.
7-53-66-4
R16
Marterer M.
Rosenkranz M.
6-37-63
Otte O.[5]
Lenz J.
6-36-4
Zuk K.
Seppi A.[3]
4-66-47-64
Lacko L.
Machac T.[6]
6-726-47-62
Bachinger M.
Van Rijthoven T.
6-746-46-2
Forejtek J.
Maden Y.
7-633-66-1
Halys Q.[8]
Bemelmans R.
7-686-756-4
Cressy M.[7]
Virtanen O.
7-653-67-5
R32
Marterer M.
Vesely J.[2]
7-686-4
Rosenkranz M.
Huesler M.
6-726-27-60
Lenz J.
Ilkel C.
6-757-56-1
Seppi A.[3]
Kamke T.
7-56-3
Zuk K.
Sachko V.
6-26-4
Virtanen O.
Rehberg M.
7-56-2
Cressy M.[7]
Moriya H.
6-37-5
Machac T.[6]
Coppejans K.
6-46-2
Bachinger M.
Celikbilek A.
6-36-1
Van Rijthoven T.
Hanfmann Y.[4]
5-77-646-4
Bemelmans R.
Squire H.
6-36-4
Forejtek J.
Thompson J.[1]
5-76-26-2
Halys Q.[8]
Masur D.
6-45-76-3
Otte O.[5]
Haase R.
6-746-46-4
Lacko L.
Copil M.
7-687-64
Maden Y.
Moraing M.
W/O